On Monday, December 24, 2012, thufir wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:50:47 +1100, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
Well you shouldn't need to specify full path, you may want to swap the rubies when using rvm.
So it's definitely a path problem. Can you run rbeautify from terminal without changing to be in your rvm directory ?
I don't understand what you mean. There are three settings I'm now using 'Set Build Commands'. The first two are Ruby commands:
compile /home/thufir/.rvm/rubies/default/bin/ruby "%f" beautify /home/thufir/.rbeautify.rb "%f"
The third is under Execute commands:
execute /home/thufir/.rvm/rubies/default/bin/ruby "%f"
In so far as swapping rubies, wouldn't I do so from rvm and just have Geany use the default?
The only build command which fails is beautify.
Why shouldn't you specify the full path? Do you mean that a relative path should be used?
thanks,
Thufir
Users mailing list Users@lists.geany.org javascript:; https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Your compile command should be just "ruby %f" . You shouldn't be specifying full paths.
Say you create another ruby so that your path is
/home/thufir/.rvm/rubies/a_new_ruby/bin/ruby "%f"
You would then have to change your compile commands. That defeats the point of using rvm.
All your commands should not specify a full path. When you switch rubies in rvm as long as you have beautify installed calling it should work.
Sayth