On 08/30/2007 06:46:31 PM, John Gabriele wrote:
On 8/30/07, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
Hi all, I noticed in the Balsa email client they used Ctrl-Alt-F for one shortcut - are there any problems with using Ctrl-Alt-[a-z0-9]? I
know
that Ctrl-Alt-F[1-12] are taken for consoles. If there aren't any important conflicts with window managers, perhaps we should use
Ctrl-
Alt instead of Alt-Shift for some bindings - Alt-Shift seems more difficult to hold down because they are diagonally separated.
It seems to me that GUI programs usually use the Shift key, with either Ctrl or Alt, whereas terminal-based programs only use the Shift key to reach various non-alphanumeric symbols.
Can you give some examples of Alt-Shift usage - it just seems like an awkward combination, and I thought it would be the least preferable combination of two out of Ctrl, Alt, Shift.
[...] Though, one problem I have is, every time I try to hit Shift-Ctrl-r, I keep getting Ctrl-R instead! ;)
What do you mean - that the Shift key wasn't held down enough, or that Ctrl-Shift keybindings just don't work for some reason?
If you start having Ctrl-Alt-foo keys in Geany, you begin to get a lot of keys to remember ("Can't remember that key combo. Was it Ctrl-L? Shift-Ctrl-L? Shift-Alt-L? Ctrl-Alt-L? How about Shift-Ctrl-Alt-L?").
I was saying to replace all the Shift-Alt-X bindings with Ctrl-Alt-X, just because on most keyboards it seems easier to type.
Perhaps we can make a pattern to the keybindings - e.g. at the moment all bar one of the Alt-Shift bindings is for selecting something.
Regards, Nick