-----Original Message----- It doesn't, but we could probably use Scintilla's or Tagmanager's (CTags') regex engine.
Cool. I'm getting a little more of a feel for how it works. If I find the time, I'll try to take a look at it.
Thanks, but I didn't apply it because it was too ugly. I've added a similar solution to SVN but haven't tested it - could you test it please?
I'll not take it personally. The new code is fine except that the new if needs to precede the original one. I've attached a patch which does the cut & paste.
It might make more sense to move it into the JAVA case, since the break will only be reached if it's ant output. If not, it'll roll clean through to the default case.
Hope this helps. Thanks for the modification. I had tried something similar, but didn't know how to split on multiple characters.
Jon
On 08/15/2007 06:41:23 PM, Jon Senior wrote:
I'll not take it personally. The new code is fine except that the new
No offense meant ;-)
if needs to precede the original one. I've attached a patch which does the cut & paste.
Oops. Thanks, applied in SVN.
It might make more sense to move it into the JAVA case, since the break will only be reached if it's ant output. If not, it'll roll clean through to the default case.
Perhaps, but then the general/gcc-style parsing would have to be duplicated into the Java case. I don't use Java myself, but I imagine that when compiling with gcj the error message style is the same as gcc.
Regards, Nick