Hi,
a new Windows build of the current SVN version(r2604) is available.
The links: http://files.uvena.de/geany/geany-0.15svn_r2604_setup.exe http://files.uvena.de/geany/geany-0.15svn_r2604_nogtk_setup.exe http://files.uvena.de/geany/geany-0.15svn_r2604_win32.zip
Happy testing!
Regards, Enrico
Hi,
a new Windows build of the current SVN version(r3486) is available.
Windows-specific changes since Geany 0.15: * Try to fix some problems when opening files with non-ASCII characters on Windows from the command line. * Fix wrongly sized tab close icons.
Changes to the Windows installer: * The full installer now includes the GTK 2.14 runtime environment. * Register ".geany" as Geany Project File extension. * Show a checkbox to open the Release Notes at the end of the installation. * When the installer is executed without admin privileges, install Geany only for the user. Otherwise, install Geany for All Users. * Fix problems with automatic uninstallation at startup of the installation when the installation directory were different. * Install GTK translation files only if installation of translation files were requested (saves about 22 MB otherwise). * Support silent installations.
The links: http://download.geany.org/snapshots/geany-0.16svn_3486_setup.exe http://download.geany.org/snapshots/geany-0.16svn_3486_nogtk_setup.exe
Happy testing!
Regards, Enrico
Hi,
I guess there is an issue with shipped plugins.
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:08:01 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
a new Windows build of the current SVN version(r3486) is available.
4:40:50: INFO : Geany 0.16 (svn >= r3486), GTK+ 2.14.6, GLib 2.18.3 14:40:53: INFO : Plugin "C:\Programme\Geany\lib\htmlchars.dll" is not binary compatible with this release of Geany - recompile it. 14:40:53: INFO : Plugin "C:\Programme\Geany\lib\classbuilder.dll" is not binary compatible with this release of Geany - recompile it. 14:40:53: INFO : Plugin "C:\Programme\Geany\lib\vcdiff.dll" is not binary compatible with this release of Geany - recompile it.
After this, no plugin is recognized.
Cheers Frank
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:43:13 +0100, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi,
I guess there is an issue with shipped plugins.
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:08:01 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
a new Windows build of the current SVN version(r3486) is available.
4:40:50: INFO : Geany 0.16 (svn >= r3486), GTK+ 2.14.6, GLib 2.18.3 14:40:53: INFO : Plugin "C:\Programme\Geany \lib\htmlchars.dll" is not binary compatible with this release of Geany - recompile it. 14:40:53: INFO : Plugin "C: \Programme\Geany\lib\classbuilder.dll" is not binary compatible with this release of Geany - recompile it. 14:40:53: INFO : Plugin "C:\Programme\Geany\lib\vcdiff.dll" is not binary compatible with this release of Geany - recompile it.
After this, no plugin is recognized.
Yup, for some reasons the plugins didn't get recompiled correctly. No idea what was wrong. I should maybe run 'make clean' more often but compiling everything again and again in an emulated Windows system isn't much fun :(.
Will create another installer later.
Regards, Enrico
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:31:46 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
Yup, for some reasons the plugins didn't get recompiled correctly. No idea what was wrong. I should maybe run 'make clean' more often but compiling everything again and again in an emulated Windows system isn't much fun :(.
Will create another installer later.
Everything else I've tested is working well here. (WinXP SP3)
Cheers, Frank
Enrico Tröger wrote:
Yup, for some reasons the plugins didn't get recompiled correctly. No idea what was wrong. I should maybe run 'make clean' more often but compiling everything again and again in an emulated Windows system isn't much fun :(.
OT, but: that implies you're running something like QEMU. Have you looked at KVM or does your processor preclude that? I'm running KVM here with practically native speed.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:07:03 +1100, Ross McKay rosko@zeta.org.au wrote:
Enrico Tröger wrote:
Yup, for some reasons the plugins didn't get recompiled correctly. No idea what was wrong. I should maybe run 'make clean' more often but compiling everything again and again in an emulated Windows system isn't much fun :(.
OT, but: that implies you're running something like QEMU. Have you
Currently I'm running the OSE version of VirtulBox which is pretty cool. Normal working with the guest OS is also pretty fast (compared to older versions). It's just compiling Geany completely which is a bit annoying because it's just noticeably slower (this is ok, it's an emulated system) and I don't have ccache on Windows :). However, maybe I find some Windows binaries somewhere, hehe.
looked at KVM or does your processor preclude that? I'm running KVM here with practically native speed.
I had a look at KVM some time ago (IIRC in April or May '08) and it was slower than VirtualBox, so I sticked to VBox. My CPU[1] supports the KVM features only partly. I don't remember the details right now but my CPU 'only' has the 'svm' extension. But the features for effective memory handling and another thing are missing. Maybe I'll give it another try soon and check what has changed.
[1] AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+
Regards, Enrico
Enrico Tröger wrote:
Currently I'm running the OSE version of VirtulBox which is pretty cool. Normal working with the guest OS is also pretty fast (compared to older versions). It's just compiling Geany completely which is a bit annoying because it's just noticeably slower (this is ok, it's an emulated system) and I don't have ccache on Windows :). However, maybe I find some Windows binaries somewhere, hehe. [...] [1] AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+
I'm running on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-55 at 1.8GHz on a laptop. I/O intensive stuff is slower, probably mostly because I'm using the qcow2 format; using raw format files or a dedicated partition is faster. Something similar might benefit your VirtualBox config if you haven't looked at that aspect.
I think KVM is worth checking out again, it has had some improvements. Conversely, it's probably time I checked out VirtualBox, I haven't looked at it since just before Sun bought them out.
cheers, Ross.