Fedora 25 Repo is Missing geany-plugins - Users

Dominic Hopf

13 Dec 13 Dec

10:01 a.m.

Greetings, as far as I can see the current Geany-Plugins 1.29 should be available in the stable Fedora 25 repositories: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01ad22d5c5 Please note that, with dnf, the usage for the installation changed a bit and you will have to put quotes around the package pattern: sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' However, you are right that the installation instructions on the website were not up-to-date. This now has been fixed with http://tiny.cc/q4qphy Regards, Dominic On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Fedge No <fedge-no(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

...

The Fedora plugins documentation page is a little outdated. The page shows to use yum, not dnf and the repo doesn't have a package with the name geany-plugins. I suppose the yum command is still mapped to dnf and that would be better for CentOS users or something. I was hoping to install them all with one shot but it looks like I will have to do them individually for now. There seems to be two versions of geany-plugins-lipsum that conflict as well so dnf install geany-plugins-* doesn't work, either. I don't know if this is all intentional but I found it a bit inconvenient. Most people using Geany probably know how to work around this sort of stuff but it is what it is. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface.

Reply

Dominic Hopf

14 Dec 14 Dec

12:53 p.m.

Greetings, just to clarify the situation, I actually am the Fedora packager of Geany and Geany-Plugins. Even if there probably is a syntax issue in the RPM Specfile - which is stated by rpmlint you see some more information about this update, beneath some others, the fact that it is available in the stable Fedora repositories. There is no single Fedora package of Geany-Plugins. It is intended (and usual on Fedora) to install stuff this way: sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' Regards, Dominic On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Fedge No <fedge-no(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

...

If you have a look at that link it apparently shows that both geany and geany-plugins failed rpmlint, whatever that is. That's probably why the plugins aren't available as a single package. I am not sure why geany itself is. Maybe an older version was provided before the new one failed that lint test. On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:01 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:

Greetings, as far as I can see the current Geany-Plugins 1.29 should be available in the stable Fedora 25 repositories: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01ad22d5c5 Please note that, with dnf, the usage for the installation changed a bit and you will have to put quotes around the package pattern: sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' However, you are right that the installation instructions on the website were not up-to-date. This now has been fixed with http://tiny .cc/q4qphy Regards, Dominic On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Fedge No <fedge-no(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

The Fedora plugins documentation page is a little outdated. The page shows to use yum, not dnf and the repo doesn't have a package with the name geany-plugins. I suppose the yum command is still mapped to dnf and that would be better for CentOS users or something. I was hoping to install them all with one shot but it looks like I will have to do them individually for now. There seems to be two versions of geany-plugins-lipsum that conflict as well so dnf install geany-plugins-* doesn't work, either. I don't know if this is all intentional but I found it a bit inconvenient. Most people using Geany probably know how to work around this sort of stuff but it is what it is. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface.

Reply

Dominic Hopf

15 Dec 15 Dec

3:08 p.m.

Hi Fedge, this indeed seems to be a bug/a mistake I made. I've built new packages which should fix that. You will see here as soon as the updates are available: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=geany-plugins Thanks very much for reporting this & Regards, Dominic On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Fedge No <fedge-no(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

...

Well thanks for your time and the information. I have never really looked into the workings of the RPM system much. I've been having this issue since I installed Fedora 25 on a new machine, fresh install. Here's my dnf run with a few attempts at troubleshooting on my end. It's been exactly the same since the machine was set up. [root@fedge ~]# dnf install geany-plugins-* Last metadata expiration check: 1:36:46 ago on Wed Dec 14 06:17:33 2016. Error: package geany-plugins-lipsum-1.29-1.fc25.x86_64 obsoletes geany- plugins-geanylipsum <= 1.28 provided by geany-plugins-geanylipsum-1.28- 1.fc25.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) [root@fedge ~]# dnf --allowerasing install geany-plugins-* Last metadata expiration check: 1:37:15 ago on Wed Dec 14 06:17:33 2016. Error: package geany-plugins-lipsum-1.29-1.fc25.x86_64 obsoletes geany- plugins-geanylipsum <= 1.28 provided by geany-plugins-geanylipsum-1.28- 1.fc25.x86_64 [root@fedge ~]# dnf remove geany-plugins-lipsum No match for argument: geany-plugins-lipsum Error: No packages marked for removal. On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 12:53 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:

Greetings, just to clarify the situation, I actually am the Fedora packager of Geany and Geany-Plugins. Even if there probably is a syntax issue in the RPM Specfile - which is stated by rpmlint you see some more information about this update, beneath some others, the fact that it is available in the stable Fedora repositories. There is no single Fedora package of Geany-Plugins. It is intended (and usual on Fedora) to install stuff this way: sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' Regards, Dominic On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Fedge No <fedge-no(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

If you have a look at that link it apparently shows that both geany and geany-plugins failed rpmlint, whatever that is. That's probably why the plugins aren't available as a single package. I am not sure why geany itself is. Maybe an older version was provided before the new one failed that lint test. On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:01 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:

Greetings, as far as I can see the current Geany-Plugins 1.29 should be available in the stable Fedora 25 repositories: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01ad22d5c

5

Please note that, with dnf, the usage for the installation

changed a

bit and you will have to put quotes around the package pattern: sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*' However, you are right that the installation instructions on the website were not up-to-date. This now has been fixed with http://

tiny

.cc/q4qphy Regards, Dominic On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Fedge No <fedge-no(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > The Fedora plugins documentation page is a little outdated. The > page > shows to use yum, not dnf and the repo doesn't have a package

with

> the > name geany-plugins. I suppose the yum command is still mapped

to

> dnf and > that would be better for CentOS users or something. I was

hoping to

> install them all with one shot but it looks like I will have to

do

> them > individually for now. There seems to be two versions of > geany-plugins-lipsum that conflict as well so dnf install > geany-plugins-* doesn't work, either. I don't know if this is

all

> intentional but I found it a bit inconvenient. Most people

using

> Geany > probably know how to work around this sort of stuff but it is

what

> it is. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)lists.geany.org > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom

Webinterface

aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus geschrieben habe. This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface.

Reply