I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build)
Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7.
You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was.
I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P
Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 doesn't seem likely to happen.
We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about what failed we can't do much.
Cheers Lex
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build)
Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7.
You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was.
I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P
Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 doesn't seem likely to happen.
We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about what failed we can't do much.
Cheers Lex
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be met?
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build)
Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7. You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was.
I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P
Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 doesn't seem likely to happen.
We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about what failed we can't do much.
Cheers Lex
> _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
"Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be met?
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build)
Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote: >> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7. > You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. > > I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P > > Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance > updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 > doesn't seem likely to happen. > > We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI > uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about > what failed we can't do much. > > Cheers > Lex > >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
"Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be met?
Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded.
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com
wrote:
So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the
problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language
features is required.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build)
Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort
unless anyone else has an idea?
Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on
CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com
wrote:
> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as
well. ;)
> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but
I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though.
> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can
tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is.
Cheers Lex
> Regards, > Dominic > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users <
users@lists.geany.org> wrote:
>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I
would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7.
>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >> >> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P >> >> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance >> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or
1.39
>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >> >> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what
Github CI
>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about >> what failed we can't do much. >> >> Cheers >> Lex >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
"Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be
met? Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak instead. If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. these ones that would be great:
https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org
wrote:
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com
wrote:
So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the
problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language
features is required.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build)
Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort
unless anyone else has an idea?
Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on
CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com
wrote:
>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here
as well. ;)
>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but
I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though.
>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can
tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
>> > Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be > much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. > > Cheers > Lex > >> Regards, >> Dominic >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users <
users@lists.geany.org> wrote:
>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I
would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7.
>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>> >>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic
;-P
>>> >>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC
maintenance
>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or
1.39
>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>> >>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what
Github CI
>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about >>> what failed we can't do much. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Lex >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
"Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can
be met? Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 16:21, Dominic Hopf via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak instead. If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. these ones that would be great:
https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos
Regards, Dominic
Does the flatpack work with the plugins? (which was where we started).
Cheers Lex
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
I accidently took us off list, added us back.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote: > So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message: > > configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) > Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the changes between the old version and the new versions (two major versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support both.
> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? > Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then? > Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime library was available I guess. But I am no container expert.
Cheers Lex
> Regards, > Dominic > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote: >>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) >>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. >>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update. >>> >> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be >> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. >> >> Cheers >> Lex >> >>> Regards, >>> Dominic >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote: >>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7. >>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>>> >>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P >>>> >>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance >>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 >>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>>> >>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI >>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about >>>> what failed we can't do much. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Lex >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
"Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be met?
Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
I don't know, as I did not build the flatpak nor use it myself. The flatpak would need to bundle the plugins, of course (as flatpaks bundle everything else as well). I guess that still needs to be tested as well as if it was possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7 at all.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:56 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 16:21, Dominic Hopf via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak instead.
If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. these ones that would be great:
https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos
Regards, Dominic
Does the flatpack work with the plugins? (which was where we started).
Cheers Lex
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com
wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you
check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is?
If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the
Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org
wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org
wrote:
On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: > I accidently took us off list, added us back. > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com
wrote:
>> So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the
problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
>> >> configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language
features is required.
>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >> > Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla > versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the > changes between the old version and the new versions (two major > versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to
support
> both. > >> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort
unless anyone else has an idea?
>> Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on
CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
>> > Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms > would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer > runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI
now.
> Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime > library was available I guess. But I am no container expert. > > Cheers > Lex > >> Regards, >> Dominic >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com
wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf <
dmaphy@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading
here as well. ;)
>>>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7,
but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though.
>>>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can
tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
>>>> >>> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there
won't be
>>> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Lex >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dominic >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users <
users@lists.geany.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into
this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7.
>>>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>>>> >>>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being
pragmatic ;-P
>>>>> >>>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC
maintenance
>>>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38
or 1.39
>>>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>>>> >>>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what
Github CI
>>>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info
about
>>>>> what failed we can't do much. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Lex >>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
"Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on
the
Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement
can be met?
Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system.
CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded.
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 17:06, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't know, as I did not build the flatpak nor use it myself.
Seems like flathub doesn't list who maintains it, AFAICT, so could be anybody, competence unknown. IIRC kugel- identified some issues relating to flatpacking Geany, not sure if thats solved or not.
The flatpak would need to bundle the plugins, of course (as flatpaks bundle everything else as well).
Ok, thats not the flathub one AFAICT.
I guess that still needs to be tested as well as if it was possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7 at all.
Google says its possible https://flatpak.org/setup/CentOS ... in fact built-in.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:56 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 16:21, Dominic Hopf via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak instead. If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. these ones that would be great:
https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos
Regards, Dominic
Does the flatpack work with the plugins? (which was where we started).
Cheers Lex
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote: > On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: >> I accidently took us off list, added us back. >> >> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote: >>> So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message: >>> >>> configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. >>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >>> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >>> >> Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla >> versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the >> changes between the old version and the new versions (two major >> versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support >> both. >> >>> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? >>> Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then? >>> >> Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms >> would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer >> runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. >> Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime >> library was available I guess. But I am no container expert. >> >> Cheers >> Lex >> >>> Regards, >>> Dominic >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote: >>>>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) >>>>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. >>>>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update. >>>>> >>>> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be >>>> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Lex >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dominic >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote: >>>>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7. >>>>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P >>>>>> >>>>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance >>>>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 >>>>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>>>>> >>>>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI >>>>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about >>>>>> what failed we can't do much. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Lex >>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org > But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20? "Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository?
Cheers Lex
> If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be met?
Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
On June 21, 2023 3:51:44 AM EDT, Lex Trotman via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 17:06, Dominic Hopf dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't know, as I did not build the flatpak nor use it myself.
Seems like flathub doesn't list who maintains it, AFAICT, so could be anybody, competence unknown. IIRC kugel- identified some issues relating to flatpacking Geany, not sure if thats solved or not.
The flatpak would need to bundle the plugins, of course (as flatpaks
bundle everything else as well).
Ok, thats not the flathub one AFAICT.
I guess that still needs to be tested as well as if it was possible
to install flatpaks on CentOS 7 at all.
Google says its possible https://flatpak.org/setup/CentOS ... in fact built-in.
Cheers Lex
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:56 AM Lex Trotman via Users
users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 16:21, Dominic Hopf via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
Also, you did not come back to my point on installing a flatpak
instead. If it was possible for you to follow instructions like e.g. these ones that would be great:
https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-install-flatpak-on-centos
Regards, Dominic
Does the flatpack work with the plugins? (which was where we
started).
Cheers Lex
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:16 AM Dominic Hopf
dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can
you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is?
If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in
the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users
users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users
users@lists.geany.org wrote:
>> On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: >>> I accidently took us off list, added us back. >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf
dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
>>>> So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right
now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message:
>>>> >>>> configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17
language features is required.
>>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9
(%build)
>>>> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >>>> >>> Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense,
Scintilla
>>> versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17,
and the
>>> changes between the old version and the new versions (two
major
>>> versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to
support
>>> both. >>> >>>> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense
effort unless anyone else has an idea?
>>>> Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install
flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then?
>>>> >>> Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised
mechanisms
>>> would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against
a newer
>>> runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles
and CI now.
>>> Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++
runtime
>>> library was available I guess. But I am no container
expert.
>>> >>> Cheers >>> Lex >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dominic >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman
elextr@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf
dmaphy@googlemail.com wrote:
>>>>>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm
reading here as well. ;)
>>>>>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for
CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though.
>>>>>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either
I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update.
>>>>>> >>>>> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess
there won't be
>>>>> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Lex >>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dominic >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users
users@lists.geany.org wrote:
>>>>>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look
into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7.
>>>>>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being
pragmatic ;-P
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC
maintenance
>>>>>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so
1.38 or 1.39
>>>>>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is
what Github CI
>>>>>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any
info about
>>>>>>> what failed we can't do much. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Lex >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
users-leave@lists.geany.org
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
users-leave@lists.geany.org
>>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org >> But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17?
See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/h.... Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20?
> "Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for
developers on the
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for
Centos 7,
> and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7
repository?
> > Cheers > Lex > >> If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler
requirement can be met?
Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system.
CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded.
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Please, no flatpak...
On 06/21/2023 02:16 AM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users <users@lists.geany.org mailto:users@lists.geany.org> wrote:
On 06/20/2023 08:29 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 09:14, H via Users <users@lists.geany.org <mailto:users@lists.geany.org>> wrote: >> On 06/20/2023 04:10 AM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote: >>> I accidently took us off list, added us back. >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 23:11, Dominic Hopf <dmaphy@googlemail.com <mailto:dmaphy@googlemail.com>> wrote: >>>> So I did a quick try to build Geany 1.38 for EPEL7, right now the problem is that `./configure` already fails with this message: >>>> >>>> configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++17 language features is required. >>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >>>> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X4sTL9 (%build) >>>> >>> Ok, thats not one that is fixable in a practical sense, Scintilla >>> versions after the 3.x.x stable versions do require C++17, and the >>> changes between the old version and the new versions (two major >>> versions after all) have too many changes to be practical to support >>> both. >>> >>>> I'm afraid this is not possible to build without immense effort unless anyone else has an idea? >>>> Does one of you guys know if it's possible to install flatpaks on CentOS 7? Probably that could be an idea then? >>>> >>> Well, I guess Flatsnaps, dockers or other containerised mechanisms >>> would maybe allow for a newer C++ compiler to build against a newer >>> runtime. Docker is used to do the Windows cross compiles and CI now. >>> Would need to run in the container too so the newer C++ runtime >>> library was available I guess. But I am no container expert. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Lex >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dominic >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lex Trotman <elextr@gmail.com <mailto:elextr@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 19:10, Dominic Hopf <dmaphy@googlemail.com <mailto:dmaphy@googlemail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> No need to ask in the RedHat Bugzilla at all as I'm reading here as well. ;) >>>>>> I remember there were issues building Geany 1.38 for CentOS 7, but I don't remember what issues that was in detail, though. >>>>>> I'll retry as soon as I can and will let you know. Either I can tell you what the issue is or probably there will be an update. >>>>>> >>>>> Thank you, if its a dependency thats too olde I guess there won't be >>>>> much we can do, but its good to know what the problem is. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Lex >>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dominic >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM Lex Trotman via Users <users@lists.geany.org <mailto:users@lists.geany.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Lex, is there anything I can do if you want to look into this? I would love to have 1.38 - and hopefully 1.39 - available for CentOS 7. >>>>>>> You could ask on Centos bugzilla what the problem was. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't want to sound negative, so lets call it being pragmatic ;-P >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Centos 7 has one year of maintenance updates left, IIUC maintenance >>>>>>> updates mean security and bugfixes, no new versions, so 1.38 or 1.39 >>>>>>> doesn't seem likely to happen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We try to keep Geany git working on Ubuntu LTS (that is what Github CI >>>>>>> uses) but no guarantees on older things and without any info about >>>>>>> what failed we can't do much. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Lex >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org <mailto:users@lists.geany.org> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org <mailto:users-leave@lists.geany.org> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org <mailto:users@lists.geany.org> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org <mailto:users-leave@lists.geany.org> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org <mailto:users@lists.geany.org> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org <mailto:users-leave@lists.geany.org> >> But does not Red Hat Developer Toolset 10.x support C/C++17? See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_developer_toolset/12/html-single/user_guide/index#sect-GCC-CPP-Compatibility. Although I myself have an earlier version of the Developer Toolset installed on my own computer, it seems that the latest release, Developer Toolset 12 even supports C/C++20? > "Red Hat Developer Toolset is a Red Hat offering for developers on the > Red Hat Enterprise Linux platform." so is it available for Centos 7, > and is it supported to build software for the Centos 7 repository? > > Cheers > Lex > >> If my reading is correct, it would seem the compiler requirement can be met? Yes, I have been using an earlier version on my CentOS 7 system. CentOS and RHEL are ABI compatible. The same repositories are used for software to be downloaded. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org <mailto:users@lists.geany.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org <mailto:users-leave@lists.geany.org>
It seems Developer Toolset 7 through 11 are available freely on https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/ (I believe I have Developer Toolset 7 installed on my computer).
I have not found Developer Toolset 12 there yet but since it seems version 11 supports C/C++ 17 it ought to be sufficient.
Perhaps compiling geany could be done using docker using a CentOS 7 image?
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 08:49, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/21/2023 02:16 AM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
...
It seems Developer Toolset 7 through 11 are available freely on https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/ (I believe I have Developer Toolset 7 installed on my computer).
As Dominic noted it depends on if the infrastructure that builds the repo packages has a new enough compiler available. As I pointed out previously, Centos 7 has only one year of bug and security fixes to go, the repo build farm may not support new compiler infrastructure.
I have not found Developer Toolset 12 there yet but since it seems version 11 supports C/C++ 17 it ought to be sufficient.
Perhaps compiling geany could be done using docker using a CentOS 7 image?
Sure, but "somebody" has to do it. That is not really the way the FedRedCent workflow goes so whoever does it probably has to host it themselves.
To be honest it is looking like you need to compile it yourself, in which case you can try the git version, not 1.38, and see if the problem has been fixed.
Cheers Lex
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
On 06/21/2023 07:54 PM, Lex Trotman via Users wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 08:49, H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
On 06/21/2023 02:16 AM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
So I don't have any CentOS 7 system up and running somewhere. Can you check if this ominous Red Hat Developer Toolset can be found on your CentOS 7 machine and what the package name is? If so, that still doesn't have to mean that the build servers in the Fedora infrastructure responsible for building EPEL packages have the same package available, but I can try, at least.
Regards, Dominic
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:57 AM H via Users users@lists.geany.org wrote:
...
It seems Developer Toolset 7 through 11 are available freely on https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/ (I believe I have Developer Toolset 7 installed on my computer).
As Dominic noted it depends on if the infrastructure that builds the repo packages has a new enough compiler available. As I pointed out previously, Centos 7 has only one year of bug and security fixes to go, the repo build farm may not support new compiler infrastructure.
I have not found Developer Toolset 12 there yet but since it seems version 11 supports C/C++ 17 it ought to be sufficient.
Perhaps compiling geany could be done using docker using a CentOS 7 image?
Sure, but "somebody" has to do it. That is not really the way the FedRedCent workflow goes so whoever does it probably has to host it themselves.
To be honest it is looking like you need to compile it yourself, in which case you can try the git version, not 1.38, and see if the problem has been fixed.
Cheers Lex
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
Users mailing list -- users@lists.geany.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.geany.org
You are right, I should try to compile it myself. At that time, I will most likely have questions...