As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that, I tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move me back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the left for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the combo is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows and pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:46 +0200, "Mateusz Mucha" muszek@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that, I tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move me back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the left for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the combo is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows and pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
I've exactly the same request!
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
-H-
-- regards, muszek - jerzy - Mateusz Mucha
On 07/19/2007 03:47:42 PM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:46 +0200, "Mateusz Mucha" muszek@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that,
I
tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move
me
back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the
left
for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the
combo
is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows
and
pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
I've exactly the same request!
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
This has recently been added to SVN ;-)
Regards, Nick
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:27:59 +0100 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
| > | This has recently been added to SVN ;-) | | Regards, | Nick
I'm not familiar with "SVN". Judging by it's name is this like a beta version that's still in testing?
Lee
On 7/19/07, Lee Underwood leeu@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:27:59 +0100 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
| > | This has recently been added to SVN ;-) | | Regards, | Nick
I'm not familiar with "SVN". Judging by it's name is this like a beta version that's still in testing?
Hi Lee,
"SVN" is short for "Subversion", the name of the version control software that the developers use to keep track of source code changes to Geany. The latest "release" of Geany is a version of Geany from a short while back that was deemed stable enough to release. To run the cutting-edge version, you need to get the source code directly from svn and build it yourself.
Every time Enrico or Nick make a change to Geany, lots of folks go and grab those most recent changes (via svn), and rebuild Geany on their machines to try out those changes.
Some brief instructions for this are at http://geany.uvena.de/Download/SVN . See also the README and INSTALL files in the source code distribution.
---John
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:33:45 -0400 "John Gabriele" jmg3000@gmail.com wrote:
Every time Enrico or Nick make a change to Geany,
Not only Enrico and Nick, but also Clytie and me ;)
lots of folks go and grab those most recent changes (via svn), and rebuild Geany on their machines to try out those changes.
Also there are some statistics for svn-repository of Geany available: http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=153444&ugn=gean...
Regards, Frank
On 7/19/07, Frank Lanitz linux@partysoke.de wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:33:45 -0400 "John Gabriele" jmg3000@gmail.com wrote:
Every time Enrico or Nick make a change to Geany,
Not only Enrico and Nick, but also Clytie and me ;)
Oh my, sorry. :) That was rude of me. Of course, that should've been "Every time someone makes a change to Geany in the repository...".
Thanks, ---John
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:33:45 -0400 "John Gabriele" jmg3000@gmail.com wrote:
| Hi Lee, | | "SVN" is short for "Subversion", the name of the version control | software that the developers use to keep track of source code changes | to Geany. The latest "release" of Geany is a version of Geany from a | short while back that was deemed stable enough to release. To run the | cutting-edge version, you need to get the source code directly from | svn and build it yourself. | | Every time Enrico or Nick make a change to Geany, lots of folks go and | grab those most recent changes (via svn), and rebuild Geany on their | machines to try out those changes. | | Some brief instructions for this are at | http://geany.uvena.de/Download/SVN . See also the README and INSTALL | files in the source code distribution. | | ---John | _______________________________________________
Thanks, John. Now I understand. So when I see someone talking about features in the current SVN, I can know that, once it is deemed stable, the updated version will be "released", right?
Lee
On 7/19/07, Lee Underwood leeu@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Thanks, John. Now I understand. So when I see someone talking about features in the current SVN, I can know that, once it is deemed stable, the updated version will be "released", right?
Generally, the folks running the show wait until a number of features have been added, and have had time to be tested a bit before making a release.
What's in svn is generally plenty stable though. At least, that's what I've found. Various factors can keep a release from happening. Maybe someone's waiting to add a pet feature, or docs just need to be updated, or maybe translation work has to be finished up (I don't know anything about that though).
---John
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:19:17 -0400, "John Gabriele" jmg3000@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/19/07, Lee Underwood leeu@cfl.rr.com wrote:
Thanks, John. Now I understand. So when I see someone talking about features in the current SVN, I can know that, once it is deemed stable, the updated version will be "released", right?
Generally, the folks running the show wait until a number of features have been added, and have had time to be tested a bit before making a release.
What's in svn is generally plenty stable though. At least, that's what I've found. Various factors can keep a release from happening. Maybe someone's waiting to add a pet feature, or docs just need to be updated, or maybe translation work has to be finished up (I don't know anything about that though).
It is generally exactly like that. Ok, if we would wait for some kind of complete documentation we wouldn't have already version 0.11 ;-). But most stoppers for a release are translation work or just testing of new features.
Anyway, anyone who want to help developing Geany, just using it helps a lot. The more people are testing the current SVn version with its new features the more bugs can be detected and fixed so that the upcoming release will be even better.
Regards, Enrico
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:27:59 +0100, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On 07/19/2007 03:47:42 PM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:46 +0200, "Mateusz Mucha" muszek@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that,
I
tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move
me
back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the
left
for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the
combo
is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows
and
pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
I've exactly the same request!
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
This has recently been added to SVN ;-)
Regards, Nick
Nick,
I'd like to test it, but I keep geeting this error:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/plugins' Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726' make: *** [install] Error 2
-H-
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 8:53:51 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
[snip]
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
This has recently been added to SVN ;-)
Regards, Nick
Nick,
I'd like to test it, but I keep geeting this error:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/plugins' Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726' make: *** [install] Error 2
Could clean up your working copy? That is, make distclean ./autogen.sh [configure-options] make
Maybe there is a problem with an existing po/Makefile.in.in. To get sure, just do: svn revert po/Makefile.in.in.
HTH, Enrico
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 8:53:51 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:27:59 +0100, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On 07/19/2007 03:47:42 PM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:46 +0200, "Mateusz Mucha" muszek@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that,
I
tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move
me
back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the
left
for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the
combo
is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows
and
pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
I've exactly the same request!
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
This has recently been added to SVN ;-)
Regards, Nick
Nick,
I'd like to test it, but I keep geeting this error:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/plugins' Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1726' make: *** [install] Error 2
-H-
I've returned to my work after a (short) week of vacation, and I still have trouble installing Geany on this Debian Etch system... Geany installs fine on my home installation of Ubuntu Fiesty 7.04.
I've done both a "make distclean" as an "svn export" to ensure that there's no cruft left from previous compiles, but to no avail:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Help?
-H-
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 9:42:29 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Help?
Found it!
I've installed automake 1.9 (1.4 and 1.7 were installed) and the compile went successfully. Maybe Geany can check for the required version of automake before compiling?
-H-
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:10:34 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 9:42:29 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Help?
Found it!
I've installed automake 1.9 (1.4 and 1.7 were installed) and the
It also should work with 1.4. Could you try again with SVN r1766 (I just removed the more or less useless po/Makefile.in.in)?
Regards, Enrico
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:28:41 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:10:34 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 9:42:29 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Help?
Found it!
I've installed automake 1.9 (1.4 and 1.7 were installed) and the
It also should work with 1.4. Could you try again with SVN r1766 (I just removed the more or less useless po/Makefile.in.in)?
Regards, Enrico
I've reverted to 1.4 & 1.7 (intltool depends on 1.7): same error...
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767' make: *** [install] Error 2
You've stated that you've deleted the po/Makefile.in.in, but it get's recreated?
harold@leibniz:~$ la svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po/Makefile.in.in -rw-r--r-- 1 harold harold 6.5K 2007-08-01 10:12 svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po/Makefile.in.in
-H-
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:36:38 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:28:41 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:10:34 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 9:42:29 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Help?
Found it!
I've installed automake 1.9 (1.4 and 1.7 were installed) and the
It also should work with 1.4. Could you try again with SVN r1766 (I just removed the more or less useless po/Makefile.in.in)?
Regards, Enrico
I've reverted to 1.4 & 1.7 (intltool depends on 1.7): same error...
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767' make: *** [install] Error 2
No idea what's happening. I have a Debian Testing too. But if I do a fresh checkout and run ./autogen.sh make it runs fine without any problems. (automake1.4 1:1.4-p6-12, automake1.7 1.7.9-9, autoconf 2.61-4, intltool 0.35.5-4, intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1)
You've stated that you've deleted the po/Makefile.in.in, but it get's recreated?
Yes, it gets (re)created by the autotools, this is usual and because it doesn't seem the reason just nevermind it.
Regards, Enrico
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:54:46 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:36:38 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:28:41 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:10:34 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 9:42:29 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Found it!
I've installed automake 1.9 (1.4 and 1.7 were installed) and the
It also should work with 1.4. Could you try again with SVN r1766 (I just removed the more or less useless po/Makefile.in.in)?
I've reverted to 1.4 & 1.7 (intltool depends on 1.7): same error...
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767' make: *** [install] Error 2
No idea what's happening. I have a Debian Testing too. But if I do a fresh checkout and run ./autogen.sh make it runs fine without any problems.
But it fails when doing make install. I thought we are talking about only "make" but when reading your posted output a bit more carefully one can easily see you ran "make install". I'm sorry.
A quick google search pointed me to [1] but there is only a workaround mentioned, nothing about a reason or real solution. I will have a closer look tomorrow. I guess I broke it with my intltool commit some days ago.
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351522
Regards, Enrico
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:04:10 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:54:46 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:36:38 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:28:41 +0200, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:10:34 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 9:42:29 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1765' make: *** [install] Error 2
Found it!
I've installed automake 1.9 (1.4 and 1.7 were installed) and the
It also should work with 1.4. Could you try again with SVN r1766 (I just removed the more or less useless po/Makefile.in.in)?
I've reverted to 1.4 & 1.7 (intltool depends on 1.7): same error...
Making install in po make[2]: Entering directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[2]: install_sh@: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767/po' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/svn/geany-0.12-svn1767' make: *** [install] Error 2
No idea what's happening. I have a Debian Testing too. But if I do a fresh checkout and run ./autogen.sh make it runs fine without any problems.
But it fails when doing make install. I thought we are talking about only "make" but when reading your posted output a bit more carefully one can easily see you ran "make install". I'm sorry.
A quick google search pointed me to [1] but there is only a workaround mentioned, nothing about a reason or real solution. I will have a closer look tomorrow. I guess I broke it with my intltool commit some days ago.
It was indeed the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL macro which caused the error. I tried to fix it(SVN r1769) by manually defining install_sh if it is not set. I guess it will work but not completely sure. So, any feedback is welcome.
Regards, Enrico
P.S.: Don't take it with a pinch of salt if I'm talking about "tomorrow" ;-).
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:27:59 +0100, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On 07/19/2007 03:47:42 PM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:46 +0200, "Mateusz Mucha" muszek@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that,
I
tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move
me
back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the
left
for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the
combo
is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows
and
pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
I've exactly the same request!
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
This has recently been added to SVN ;-)
Regards, Nick
Nick,
The back button only remembers the line number, not the exact cursor location.
Can this be added?
Cheers!
-H-
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:15:43 +0200, Harold Aling h.aling@home.nl wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:27:59 +0100, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On 07/19/2007 03:47:42 PM, Harold Aling wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:38:46 +0200, "Mateusz Mucha" muszek@gmail.com wrote:
As I'm not an experienced programmer and really lazy on top of that,
I
tend to jump to other areas of code quite often. Example: I edit line 199 at the moment, but want/need to take a look at destroy_earth() function, copy two lines of code and jump back to where I was straight away.
It would be cool if there was some keyword combo or an icon to move
me
back to where I was before I used the "functions browser" on the
left
for the last time (and perhaps the last time before that if the
combo
is used twice"). It should ignore jumps achieved by using arrows
and
pgup/pgdn.
Or perhaps a similar feature is impremented alredy?
I've exactly the same request!
What if the "Symbol sidebar" would add the cursor location to the back/forward history before moving focus to the selected function/location in the sidebar? Then you would be able to press 'back' to return to the previous position.
This has recently been added to SVN ;-)
Regards, Nick
Nick,
The back button only remembers the line number, not the exact cursor location.
Can this be added?
It can ;-) but one has to do it. I also would like it to store the cursor position instead of only the line number. Anyway, in some cases it isn't possible because there is no information about the cursor available but if we should use it. Maybe I'll work on it soon.
Regards, Enrico