On 8 September 2010 20:22, Jake Subs subs@growdigital.net wrote:
2010/8/29 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de:
Maybe updating GVfs, gvfs-fuse helps, otherwise try to report a bug against these packages. Thanks.
So it _is_ GVFS that is causing the problem?
I've checked my packages (Ubuntu Lucid) and they're all up to date. http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libs/gvfs
What would I put in the bug report for GVFS?! Sorry to be vague but I don't understand what the issue is between Geany & GVFS!
Geany doesn't actually know how to save over SSH, instead GVFS, specifically GVFS-fuse, provides the capability as if the file was local, ie Geany reads and writes to it using C standard posix calls just like a local file.
Therefore, as Enrico said, the performance issue is in the GVFS-fuse part as evidenced by the difference in the performance when you copied using standard unix cp which uses the same C standard calls as Geany compared to GVFS-cp which bypasses the -fuse part of the system by using a non-standard interface.
Cheers Lex
thanks for replying, Jake _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list Geany@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany