On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:01:59 -0400, Randy wrote:
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 02:23:39 pm Enrico Tröger wrote:
Well, I completely understand your issue. And basically I tend to agree that a fixed width is not good. OTOH I just like the reduced width as it does read better for me on my widescreen (as already pointed out). But yes, not everybody has a widescreen, not everybody likes tiny fonts as I do and so on.
So, maybe we should indeed remove the fixed width to make it easier for most users to read.
Lex made/found a suggestion to change the line: width: 60em; to: max-width: 60em;
And that seems to work well for me and for him--if it works for you, that seems to be a good solution. (I haven't spent much time testing it, but it's hard to imagine what could go wrong...bad move, hunh ;-)
Oops, I was too slow. I replied about this in the other mail, sorry for the confusion. Still, Lex' suggestion is great and as I said, I also don't see a reason why we shouldn't it.
Regards, Enrico