Le 24/05/2011 06:52, Lex Trotman a écrit :
BUT: Inside Lex's version there was the command \setcounter{secnumdepth}{0} which is telling to don't put any section numbering in levels below level 0 (so complete document). Setting this to 3 is giving a numbered result -- which is what we were talking about and quiet confusing me. Also they don't use the *-version of sections commands in this case. A bug inside rst2latex or just in my brain? Having a look inside man page (10.04 Ubuntu) its telling me this:
--section-numbering Enable section numbering by Docutils. (default) --no-section-numbering Disable section numbering by Docutils.
Well, looks like the Docutils numbering don't work, and that --no-section-numbering works as expected: removes sections numbering. However, it don't seem possible to really easily have LaTeX section numbering.
Maybe I just misunderstood this whole stuff?
Hi Frank,
I havn't had time to try anything else, but I did find this page which I havn't seen before. It says the to set the secnumdepth using a Latex stylesheet (see section numbering part).
In general it seems to cover more of using rst with latex.
Hey, good link! Looks like (part of) the hackish sed stuff I did may not be useful. Frank, is there a way to put the TOC on it's own page without manually adding \newpage after \tableofcontents ? if yes, I could drop the sed stuff in favor to either a stylesheet or the template.
Cheers, Colomban