On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:45:27 +0100 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:00:47 +1000 Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/15 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:44:42 +0200, Thomas wrote:
Nick Treleaven schrieb:
so sometime we can release v1.0.
No, don't! :P
Haha!
For why should it be increasing? Perhaps Geany could start a trend of decreasing version numbers starting from version 2^32 and when it reaches zero that would indeed be a milestone ;-)
Then continue with negative numbers ;-)
Personally I'm not updating Firefox again 'til they release 3.5 + 1.1i.
Why not in a form like this? r * e^(i*phi)
0.17 does look low. So the only reason to go to 1.0 would be to enhance your marketing in support of world domination!!
Agreed, it's worth it for the marketing benefits.
I doubt that there is really a benefit for marketing. At least inside the group of users Geany is addressing.
Cheers, Frank