On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:40:58 -0500 "Daniel Richard G." skunk@iSKUNK.ORG wrote:
- Various cases of foo() --> foo(void). (Come on guys... the only excuse is if you're older than dirt and still haven't broken your old K&R habits :)
Or you are used to C++ or C99 ;-) My brain keeps saying the 'void' is redundant. But I updated my function snippet a while ago to do it for me usually.
But the real problem is that gcc doesn't warn about it (or I haven't found an option for gcc 4.1 anyway).
Thanks for the patch though.
Regards, Nick