On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:46:07 -0600, "Jeff Pohlmeyer" yetanothergeek@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 7:56 AM, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
Huh, C -> Python -> Lua? I guess there are better ways to waste CPU time ;-). Maybe "cat /dev/urandom | bzip2 >/dev/null".
I'm not so sure it would be that much of a problem, most scripts probably won't be doing a lot of lengthy CPU-intensive operations anyway, especially when compared to all the
Maybe, I should have mentioned to take the above not too serious. But for the first moment it sounds a bit strange to run an interpreter within another one.
The advantage is that the interface is already defined and documented.
I didn't read the Lunatic site not carefully enough. So, I thought you can run Lua only inside Python, but now I know it's two-way and so you can run Python inside Lua. Am I right that it's basically possible to use the Lua plugin to have a Python interface (using Lunatic)?
Regards, Enrico