2006/7/25, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:04:59 -0300, "Alexandre Moreira" alexandream@gmail.com wrote:
2006/7/25, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:13:37 +0200, Andreas Tscharner andy@vis.ethz.ch wrote:
Enrico Tröger wrote:
[snip]
the author instead of the list. But setting the Reply-To-header is not the solution and is strongly discouraged. I'm not exactly sure at the
Who discourages that?
From the mailman online help: "There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: header. One is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to convey their valid return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes it much more difficult to send private replies. See `Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful[1] for a general discussion of this issue. See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful[2] for a dissenting opinion."
moment, but I believe i read something about a RFC violation or something similar.
AFAIK, it is an option (in mailman) and a matter of taste whether or not the mailinglist program sets the reply-to - header to the list...
Maybe. But with the Reply-To-header set to the list address replying a mail to the poster won't work anymore in some MUAs. The other side is a MUA should be able to reply to a mail using the From header.
@Alexandre: you are using the webmail client from gmail? Perhaps asking the Google guys for a reply-to-list feature would be useful. It's a try.
I Will try to ask them that (as soon as I find out their mail).
Should I really activate the Reply-To header munging?
I Can live with the changing the message destination if you guys can live with sometimes I forgetting it and getting duplicated messages ;)
Like this time, or should this mail go only to me?
Well, so much for "but I will try hard not to"... lol. Sorry folks, I must have some bug in my brain's code :P
Regards, Alexandre Moreira.
;-)
In any case, no problem.
Regards, Enrico
-- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.key