Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thanks for you work! Regards,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
Cheers, Frank
Thank you, Frank
The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to increase it to 1.22? I am just curious,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
Geany-i18n mailing list Geany-i18n@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-i18n
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė:
Thank you, Frank
The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to increase it to 1.22? I am just curious,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in thread)
- -- gymka GPG ID: 21C70548
Am 12.06.2012 09:17, schrieb gymka:
2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė:
Thank you, Frank
The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to increase it to 1.22? I am just curious,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in thread)
No, it will be 1.22. I has been decided within a poll. I don't understand this but most people liked to have an 1 as first digit to show geany is becoming some kind of more professional, stable... whatever.
cheers, Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
2012.06.12 10:33, Frank Lanitz rašė:
Am 12.06.2012 09:17, schrieb gymka:
2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė:
Thank you, Frank
The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to increase it to 1.22? I am just curious,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in thread)
No, it will be 1.22. I has been decided within a poll. I don't understand this but most people liked to have an 1 as first digit to show geany is becoming some kind of more professional, stable... whatever.
then it's stupid decision:)
- -- gymka GPG ID: 21C70548
Am 12.06.2012 09:38, schrieb gymka:
2012.06.12 10:33, Frank Lanitz rašė:
Am 12.06.2012 09:17, schrieb gymka:
2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė:
Thank you, Frank
The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to increase it to 1.22? I am just curious,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in thread)
No, it will be 1.22. I has been decided within a poll. I don't understand this but most people liked to have an 1 as first digit to show geany is becoming some kind of more professional, stable... whatever.
then it's stupid decision:)
Well... I have seen better decisions in past ;)
On 12/06/12 09:38, gymka wrote:
2012.06.12 10:33, Frank Lanitz rašė:
Am 12.06.2012 09:17, schrieb gymka:
2012.06.12 10:09, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov rašė:
Thank you, Frank
The last stable version of Geany is 0.21, what is the reason to increase it to 1.22? I am just curious,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:01 +0600 Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefirst@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Updated Kazakh translation is attached.
Thank you very much. I've added it to master, but needed to correct the version string as next release will be 1.22(!) release. Also I did run a updatepo onto. So please don't be confused ;)
1.22 is typing error, new version will be 0.22(as is said in thread)
No, it will be 1.22. I has been decided within a poll. I don't understand this but most people liked to have an 1 as first digit to show geany is becoming some kind of more professional, stable... whatever.
then it's stupid decision:)
It is not. There were quite some discussions about it, better first try to read them as they can be found in the archives of the devel mailing list, and finally there was a poll about the next version to get more users included to find a sane discussion. However, not that many people voted at all.
Regards, Enrico