Greetings and sorry for my delayed reply,
as I am packing the geany-plugins project for Fedora I probably can clarify some confusion:
* geany-plugins is packaged as a meta-package containing a lot of sub-packages (one for each plugin) * i actually did not recognize the bug mentioned above, but now will take care of it * reasons for not recognizing are women…
So far… what are your recommendations for properly fixing this issue? I would go ahead with removing any dependency to webkitgtk for now - which probably results in losing the above mentioned plugins in Fedora.
I'd personally appreciate if it was possible for you to upgrade your plugins to use webkitgtk3, though. If I see this correctly this is a missing step for upgrading to GTK3 anyway, isn't it? - Geany and Geany-Plugins in Fedora are still not GTK3, yet, because there were some plugins which were not GTK3-ready. Can you update me how stuff is going there?
Thanks for pinging and Best Regards, Dominic
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:20 PM Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On 13.11.2016 01:00, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 13 November 2016 at 05:47, Matthew Brush mbrush@codebrainz.ca
wrote:
On 2016-11-11 03:24 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
Hi All,
I was seeking help for some issue for the Markdown plugin with
WebKitGtk
today on IRC and someone pointed out this issue with Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375807
Basically the whole Geany-Plugins package will be removed since one of the plugins uses an older version of a library that will be removed
from
Fedora.
IMO, it would be wise to separately package plugins to prevent one outdated plugin from getting the others removed. AFAIK this is how it's packaged on Debians.
Actually according to the mailing list post (with a quite annoying tone) linked from the bug report, it lists:
geany-plugins-devhelp-0:1.27-1.fc24.x86_64 geany-plugins-geanypy-0:1.27-1.fc24.x86_64 geany-plugins-markdown-0:1.27-1.fc24.x86_64 geany-plugins-webhelper-0:1.27-1.fc24.x86_64Although a post further down has rawhide geany-plugins-1.28-1.fc26.src.rpm, so the src is one package, might be the reason.
I think Dominic might can give some details here. I've already pinged him.
Cheers, Frank
Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel