On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 15:06, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:06:45 +0200 Jiří Techet techet@gmail.com wrote:
Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project.
It's true that I've used the workflow typical for a git project - from geany web page, which offers both git and SVN repository I assumed that I can chose either of them. If git is not supposed to be used, then it should be removed from there because this makes things confusing (or at least there should be a warning saying: "Don't use the following git repository").
It's pretty clear from the GIT page that it's a read-only mirror. We don't have a writable GIT repo.
OK, I've just noticed:
"Read-only mirrors of the SVN repositories, updated shortly after real commits in the SVN repository."
But then I don't see the point of providing it if you cannot pull other people's clones of your repo.
Anyway, no problem for me to provide the changes in the form of individual patches. I'll just wait for the main developer's opinion on this before spamming with additional emails.
Individual patches are better. That saves us time. Just looking through a Git repository isn't a good way to explain changes.
OK, will send them later today
Regards,
Jiri