Ya know, I really don't even want to ask as I don't want to be a pest, but, I haven't found a good example of setting the umask prior to launching geany. I would like to set the umask and have it tied to geany only. I run a lot of unattended processes, so, the line of thinking is if I make some type of global change I could introduce a problem to another program.
I can confirm that the "save as" feature works as described in this thread. No +x attribute on the saved file.
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 April 2012 09:30, Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 April 2012 01:56, Alexander Eberspächer alex.eberspaecher@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:38:15 -0500 worthspending worthspending@gmail.com wrote:
I develop ruby code on a linux box. For all new files Geany creates, the file attributes are set to include the +x executable attribute.
Let me briefly describe a related issue: if a file with the +x attribute is opened in Geany and "Save as" as chosen, the saved file will lack the +x attribute. Is this desired behaviour?
Sorry initially misread your comment, you said "save as"
But the reason is the same as below, it creates a new file, which will get its protection from the current umask.
That *is* desired behaviour because it is how all Unix systems work, we should not be different. Users would be surprised if Geany behavior is different to all others and there is no guarantee that we can actually set any specific protections since the user may not have sufficient permission to do so due to the umask.
Cheers again Lex
This occurs when the use_atomic_file_saving option is set. It is not "desired" but it is documented behaviour and is unavoidable. As I said before, set the umask before running Geany.
Cheers Lex
Greetings
Alex
Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel