Ya know, I really don't even want to ask as I don't want to be a pest, but, I haven't found a good example of setting the umask prior to launching geany. I would like to set the umask and have it tied to geany only. I run a lot of unattended processes, so, the line of thinking is if I make some type of global change I could introduce a problem to another program.
On 4 April 2012 09:30, Lex Trotman <elextr@gmail.com> wrote:Sorry initially misread your comment, you said "save as"
> On 4 April 2012 01:56, Alexander Eberspächer
> <alex.eberspaecher@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:38:15 -0500
>> worthspending <worthspending@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I develop ruby code on a linux box. For all new files Geany creates,
>>> the file attributes are set to include the +x executable attribute.
>>
>> Let me briefly describe a related issue: if a file with the +x attribute
>> is opened in Geany and "Save as" as chosen, the saved file will lack
>> the +x attribute. Is this desired behaviour?
But the reason is the same as below, it creates a new file, which will
get its protection from the current umask.
That *is* desired behaviour because it is how all Unix systems work,
we should not be different. Users would be surprised if Geany
behavior is different to all others and there is no guarantee that we
can actually set any specific protections since the user may not have
sufficient permission to do so due to the umask.
Cheers again
Lex
>
> This occurs when the use_atomic_file_saving option is set. It is not
> "desired" but it is documented behaviour and is unavoidable. As I
> said before, set the umask before running Geany.
>
> Cheers
> Lex
>
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geany-devel mailing list
>> Geany-devel@uvena.de
>> https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel