Dear plugin-developers,
On https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pulls there are quiet a number of open pull request, which might would fit good into upcoming 1.24 release. In special
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/125
having a number of fixes for different plugins inside. Please be so kind and take the time to review them for your plugin so we these might can be merged or closed.
Cheers, Frank
Hi,
this is a friendly reminder. Please check your pull requests and patches for 1.24. Features, that are not merged until Sunday, 2014-03-30 19:00h CEST will not be part of the release.
Cheers, Frank
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:13:51 +0100 Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Dear plugin-developers,
On https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pulls there are quiet a number of open pull request, which might would fit good into upcoming 1.24 release. In special
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/125
having a number of fixes for different plugins inside. Please be so kind and take the time to review them for your plugin so we these might can be merged or closed.
Cheers, Frank _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 28 March 2014 08:25, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi,
this is a friendly reminder. Please check your pull requests and patches for 1.24. Features, that are not merged until Sunday, 2014-03-30 19:00h CEST will not be part of the release.
Cheers, Frank
Hi Frank,
The one you made on Geanypy has already been improved by upstream (Matthew) so you should just commit that improvement.
Cheers Lex
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:13:51 +0100 Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Dear plugin-developers,
On https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pulls there are quiet a number of open pull request, which might would fit good into upcoming 1.24 release. In special
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/125
having a number of fixes for different plugins inside. Please be so kind and take the time to review them for your plugin so we these might can be merged or closed.
Cheers, Frank _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 28.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Lex Trotman:
The one you made on Geanypy has already been improved by upstream (Matthew) so you should just commit that improvement.
I was planning to have a look onto it Sunday (you mean #116, don't you?). But this is not a feature, only kind of a bug fix ;)
Cheers, Frank
On 28 March 2014 19:46, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Lex Trotman:
The one you made on Geanypy has already been improved by upstream (Matthew) so you should just commit that improvement.
I was planning to have a look onto it Sunday (you mean #116, don't you?). But this is not a feature, only kind of a bug fix ;)
Yep that one, I guess its more a feature since there is no bug (in Geanypy), more its a bug in cppcheck :)
Cheers Lex
Cheers, Frank _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 28.03.2014 10:00, schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 28 March 2014 19:46, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Lex Trotman:
The one you made on Geanypy has already been improved by upstream (Matthew) so you should just commit that improvement.
I was planning to have a look onto it Sunday (you mean #116, don't you?). But this is not a feature, only kind of a bug fix ;)
Yep that one, I guess its more a feature since there is no bug (in Geanypy), more its a bug in cppcheck :)
... well.... puh... At least it's not changing any string ;) However, will do it at the weekend.
cheers, Frank
Am 28.03.2014 10:00, schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 28 March 2014 19:46, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Lex Trotman:
The one you made on Geanypy has already been improved by upstream (Matthew) so you should just commit that improvement.
I was planning to have a look onto it Sunday (you mean #116, don't you?). But this is not a feature, only kind of a bug fix ;)
Yep that one, I guess its more a feature since there is no bug (in Geanypy), more its a bug in cppcheck :)
... well.... puh... At least it's not changing any string ;) However, will do it at the weekend.
cheers, Frank _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Here is definitely false-positeve. cppcheck was confused by a terrible define: return operator inside... Without return operator of course here could be a bug.
-- Best regards, Pavel Roschin aka RPG