Hi,
In reference to the recent post on the scintilla-interest mailing list posting with the same title[1].
Would this affect Geany's support for older GTK+ versions?
Cheers, Matthew Brush
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/scintilla-interest/browse_thread/thread/0ff97...
On 1 May 2011 10:37, Matthew Brush mbrush@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
In reference to the recent post on the scintilla-interest mailing list posting with the same title[1].
Would this affect Geany's support for older GTK+ versions?
Neil states that it runs on gtk2.8 which is the version supported by Geany, so far so good.
Most of his changes are in Scite. Way too early to think about changing Geany to GTK3, let it stabilise for a while yet.
Cheers Lex
Am 01.05.2011 02:51, schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 1 May 2011 10:37, Matthew Brush mbrush@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
In reference to the recent post on the scintilla-interest mailing list posting with the same title[1].
Would this affect Geany's support for older GTK+ versions?
Neil states that it runs on gtk2.8 which is the version supported by Geany, so far so good.
Most of his changes are in Scite. Way too early to think about changing Geany to GTK3, let it stabilise for a while yet.
I agree for the meanwhile we shouldn't do any big progress to port it to 3.
Cheers, Frank
On 04/30/11 17:51, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 1 May 2011 10:37, Matthew Brushmbrush@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
In reference to the recent post on the scintilla-interest mailing list posting with the same title[1].
Would this affect Geany's support for older GTK+ versions?
Neil states that it runs on gtk2.8 which is the version supported by Geany, so far so good.
Most of his changes are in Scite. Way too early to think about changing Geany to GTK3, let it stabilise for a while yet.
For the record, I never said anything about changing to GTK+ 3...
Just curious if one of Neil's changes to be compatible with GTK+ 3 might make Geany have to drop support for 2.8 and bump to 2.10+. So far that's not the case.
Cheers, Matthew Brush