On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Nick Treleaven < nick.treleaven@btinternet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:11:15 +0000 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
Now reverted. It's not great that systems without 'which' print an error message about a missing C++ compiler, but at least this should be very rare.
Regards, Nick
I confirmed the autoconf bug(behavior). I believe this patch fixes it well. It removes the which program again as well.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Erik Southworth erik.southworth@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Nick Treleaven < nick.treleaven@btinternet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:11:15 +0000 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
Now reverted. It's not great that systems without 'which' print an error message about a missing C++ compiler, but at least this should be very rare.
Regards, Nick
I confirmed the autoconf bug(behavior). I believe this patch fixes it well. It removes the which program again as well.
Forget that. Try V3 patch. Test with './configure CXX=/usr/bin/g++' or similar.