Hi.
When performing a search inside document using non-ascii characters (cp1251 encoding in my case) search is successful only for direct (case-sensitive) match. Case insensitive search does not work for non-ascii charachers. "Case sensitive" flag in the dialog is of course unset.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:11:28 +0400, "Walery Studennikov" despairr@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
When performing a search inside document using non-ascii characters (cp1251 encoding in my case) search is successful only for direct (case-sensitive) match. Case insensitive search does not work for non-ascii charachers. "Case sensitive" flag in the dialog is of course unset.
I can confirm this and unfortunately, Scite behaves the same. So it is probably a Scintilla problem but still ugly.
Regards, Enrico
2008/12/3 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:11:28 +0400, "Walery Studennikov" despairr@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
When performing a search inside document using non-ascii characters (cp1251 encoding in my case) search is successful only for direct (case-sensitive) match. Case insensitive search does not work for non-ascii charachers. "Case sensitive" flag in the dialog is of course unset.
I can confirm this and unfortunately, Scite behaves the same. So it is probably a Scintilla problem but still ugly.
Sorry for a dumb question, may be it is already documented somethere... 1) Are we using the latest version of scintilla? 2) What is our policy of updating our version of scintilla? 3) Have we any special patches to standard version of scintilla / can we use the latest scintilla unmodified?
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:10:55 +0400 "Walery Studennikov" despairr@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for a dumb question, may be it is already documented somethere...
- Are we using the latest version of scintilla?
Yes, the latest release.
- What is our policy of updating our version of scintilla?
We usually update soon after a release.
- Have we any special patches to standard version of scintilla / can
we use the latest scintilla unmodified?
We use a patch for column editing (typing on more than one line at once). Maybe we should add that patch to SVN somewhere. Sometimes we backport changes from Scintilla CVS to test, but not often.
Regards, Nick
2008/12/4 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:10:55 +0400 "Walery Studennikov" despairr@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for a dumb question, may be it is already documented somethere...
- Are we using the latest version of scintilla?
Yes, the latest release.
Hm....
At least we have incomplete set of lexers. For instance we had no LexYAML.cxx, while it is present in the current distribution of scintilla.
* * *
Back to the point: probably we should submit bugreport about search facility to scintilla team, right?
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:14:58 +0400, "Walery Studennikov" despairr@gmail.com wrote:
2008/12/4 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:10:55 +0400 "Walery Studennikov" despairr@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for a dumb question, may be it is already documented somethere...
- Are we using the latest version of scintilla?
Yes, the latest release.
Hm....
At least we have incomplete set of lexers. For instance we had no LexYAML.cxx, while it is present in the current distribution of scintilla.
Yes, this is intended. Scintilla has way more lexers than we need/support. It just doesn't make any sense to include all available lexers. It would just increase the Geany sources and especially the binary size for no benefit.
Back to the point: probably we should submit bugreport about search facility to scintilla team, right?
Check Scintila's bugtracker before, it might be this already has been reported.
Regards, Enrico
2008/12/4 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de:
Back to the point: probably we should submit bugreport about search facility to scintilla team, right?
Check Scintila's bugtracker before, it might be this already has been reported.
I've found the problem in scintilla bugtracker: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1597654&gr...
But the problem is not fixed since 2006 :( As far as I understand, they can't find cross-platform solution for case-insensitive match :(
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:41:31 +0000, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
- Have we any special patches to standard version of scintilla / can
we use the latest scintilla unmodified?
We use a patch for column editing (typing on more than one line at once). Maybe we should add that patch to SVN somewhere. Sometimes
Yup, will do this later.
Regards, Enrico