The distribution archive file has the extension .tar.gz. Adjusted that in geany.spec.in.
Index: geany.spec.in =================================================================== --- geany.spec.in (revision 3603) +++ geany.spec.in (working copy) @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Group: Development/Tools Vendor: Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de Packager: Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de -Source: http://files.uvena.de/geany/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.bz2 +Source: http://files.uvena.de/geany/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz URL: http://www.geany.org/ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Requires: glib2, gtk2, pango
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:17:54 +0100, Wolfgang wrote:
The distribution archive file has the extension .tar.gz. Adjusted that in geany.spec.in.
Index: geany.spec.in
--- geany.spec.in (revision 3603) +++ geany.spec.in (working copy) @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Group: Development/Tools Vendor: Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de Packager: Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de -Source: http://files.uvena.de/geany/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.bz2 +Source: http://files.uvena.de/geany/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz
What is wrong with tar.bz2?
On the server both archive types exists and I like to prefer bzip2 compressed tarballs because they are smaller and so save bandwidth.
Regards, Enrico
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:42 +0100, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:17:54 +0100, Wolfgang wrote:
The distribution archive file has the extension .tar.gz. Adjusted that in geany.spec.in.
[...]
What is wrong with tar.bz2?
On the server both archive types exists and I like to prefer bzip2 compressed tarballs because they are smaller and so save bandwidth.
The problem occurs during "make rpm". Perhaps fixing Makefile.am is more appropriate?
Thanks, Wolfgang
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:47:51 +0100, Wolfgang wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:42 +0100, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:17:54 +0100, Wolfgang wrote:
The distribution archive file has the extension .tar.gz. Adjusted that in geany.spec.in.
[...]
What is wrong with tar.bz2?
On the server both archive types exists and I like to prefer bzip2 compressed tarballs because they are smaller and so save bandwidth.
The problem occurs during "make rpm". Perhaps fixing Makefile.am is more appropriate?
Ah ok, now I got it. I just didn't think of the Makefile target (/me is not a RPM user :D).
I changed the Source tag in the spec file to .tar.gz as you suggested.
Regards, Enrico