Hi all,
I am just curious what the current thought is on compiling with GIO when available.
The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is really a huge benefit, but yet I understand the added complexity and maintainability issues.
I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue" thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and it covered a few other topics.
Thanks much.
-Brad
p.s. I know all the arguments against FTP, but sometimes my hands are tied (clients are reluctant to change), despite protest. =)
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500, Brad wrote:
Hey,
The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is really a
Which patch exactly?
I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue" thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and it covered a few other topics.
Well, I think for the medium-term, we should use GIO completely for file IO. But this would mean we would need to adjust a lot of code (in Geany), we would need to find a solution for the tagmanager (which does low-level file IO on the files) and probably change the plugin API. And last but not least, we would need to bump to GTK version requirement from 2.8 to 2.12, better 2.14.
But once done, the other problems are probably less critical or solved indirectly.
For now, I would like to fix the various you guys had but currently it's hard for me as GVfs doesn't work for me at all though this is probably only a local problem with my setup.
So, if anyone has any clue, feel free to share it :).
As said in another mail, the planned release is delayed a bit, so we could fix this in time, probably.
Regards, Enrico
On 06/06/2010 12:33 PM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500, Brad wrote:
Hey,
The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is really a
Which patch exactly?
The filename is "40_gio_file_saving.dpatch". I attached it to this e-mail for easy reference.
I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue" thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and it covered a few other topics.
Well, I think for the medium-term, we should use GIO completely for file IO. But this would mean we would need to adjust a lot of code (in Geany), we would need to find a solution for the tagmanager (which does low-level file IO on the files) and probably change the plugin API. And last but not least, we would need to bump to GTK version requirement from 2.8 to 2.12, better 2.14.
I, of course, like this solution the a lot, and it seems like the most robust to me, as GIO (as far as I understand) is meant to be GLib's file interface. But I should qualify that I don't actively develop (yet) in GTK or C and am not the one that could do the necessary heavy lifting to make it happen. So, I am a pretty choosy beggar. =)
But once done, the other problems are probably less critical or solved indirectly.
For now, I would like to fix the various you guys had but currently it's hard for me as GVfs doesn't work for me at all though this is probably only a local problem with my setup.
If I can be of any help with testing/etc. please let me know, I LOVE Geany and would like to make her better with anything that I know how to do. Again, I only have an academic experience with C and none with GLib, so I probably would not be a good candidate for development.
So, if anyone has any clue, feel free to share it :).
As said in another mail, the planned release is delayed a bit, so we could fix this in time, probably.
That would be really fantastic.
Thanks very much.
-Brad
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:47:30 -0500, Brad wrote:
On 06/06/2010 12:33 PM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500, Brad wrote:
Hey,
The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is really a
Which patch exactly?
The filename is "40_gio_file_saving.dpatch". I attached it to this e-mail for easy reference.
Thanks.
I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue" thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and it covered a few other topics.
Well, I think for the medium-term, we should use GIO completely for file IO. But this would mean we would need to adjust a lot of code (in Geany), we would need to find a solution for the tagmanager (which does low-level file IO on the files) and probably change the plugin API. And last but not least, we would need to bump to GTK version requirement from 2.8 to 2.12, better 2.14.
I, of course, like this solution the a lot, and it seems like the most robust to me, as GIO (as far as I understand) is meant to be GLib's file interface. But I should qualify that I don't actively
It is.
So, if anyone has any clue, feel free to share it :).
As said in another mail, the planned release is delayed a bit, so we could fix this in time, probably.
That would be really fantastic.
Didn't work, real-life sucks :).
Regards, Enrico
On 06/12/2010 05:45 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:47:30 -0500, Brad wrote:
On 06/06/2010 12:33 PM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500, Brad wrote: So, if anyone has any clue, feel free to share it :).
As said in another mail, the planned release is delayed a bit, so we could fix this in time, probably.
That would be really fantastic.
Didn't work, real-life sucks :).
Did you meant that the patch didn't apply properly or that it couldn't get squeezed in in time for the 0.19 release?
But yes, I have experienced this phenomenon. =)
I hope that I'm not pushing something that nobody else wants.
Thanks much!
-Brad
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500 Brad Wilson brad@rhift.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am just curious what the current thought is on compiling with GIO when available.
The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is really a huge benefit, but yet I understand the added complexity and maintainability issues.
I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue" thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and it covered a few other topics.
I've just replied to the original thread: http://lists.uvena.de/geany-devel/2010-September/003103.html
I think the new patch needs testing as described but hopefully can be applied.
Regards, Nick
Non, dans gmail ça concerne les termes places dans la conversation ce me semble, ranavoir avec ton historique de navigation ^^
--- Envoyé de mon iProut \o/
On 10 sept. 2010, at 16:42, Nick Treleaven <nick.treleaven@btinternet.com
wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500 Brad Wilson brad@rhift.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am just curious what the current thought is on compiling with GIO when available.
The only reason I ask is that it (seems to) solve the GVfs bug issues at least after I applied Алексей's patch and for me that is really a huge benefit, but yet I understand the added complexity and maintainability issues.
I was following the other "Safe file saving - permissions issue" thread but it I couldn't tell if a decision had been reached, and it covered a few other topics.
I've just replied to the original thread: http://lists.uvena.de/geany-devel/2010-September/003103.html
I think the new patch needs testing as described but hopefully can be applied.
Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel