Hi all,
I noticed today a new regression in LexHTML; Using comments in XML clobbers the fold structure.
The comment 'opening' <!-- does not increase the fold level, but the 'closing' --> decreases the fold level. A simple fix is commenting out the "if (foldHTMLPreprocessor)" on line 858, LexHTML.cxx
But be forewarned: I don't know exactly when this regressed or what caused it.
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:16:57 -0700, Jason Oster parasytic@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed today a new regression in LexHTML; Using comments in XML clobbers the fold structure.
The comment 'opening' <!-- does not increase the fold level, but the 'closing' --> decreases the fold level. A simple fix is commenting out the "if (foldHTMLPreprocessor)" on line 858, LexHTML.cxx
this seems like a Scintilla bug, I opened https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2532774&gr... for this. Good catch.
But be forewarned: I don't know exactly when this regressed or what caused it.
This is caused by SVN r3462 by setting "fold.html.preprocessor" to 0 as discussed in https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=787794&aid=2003912... (starting at comment #3).
Regards, Enrico
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:43:09 +0100, Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:16:57 -0700, Jason Oster parasytic@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed today a new regression in LexHTML; Using comments in XML clobbers the fold structure.
The comment 'opening' <!-- does not increase the fold level, but the 'closing' --> decreases the fold level. A simple fix is commenting out the "if (foldHTMLPreprocessor)" on line 858, LexHTML.cxx
this seems like a Scintilla bug, I opened https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2532774&gr... for this.
Should be fixed in SVN. I just took the fix Neil committed earlier today as mentioned in the bug report above.
Jason, thanks for reporting and keeping up with this issue!
Regards, Enrico