Hi,
The description of tm_get_real_path() claims that "unlike realpath, a reasonable guess is returned even if the file does not exist". However, from what I see, it simply returns realpath(), and IMHO, it shouldn't try to guess something like that. So can we cut the description a bit?
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 15:52, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhekov@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The description of tm_get_real_path() claims that "unlike realpath, a reasonable guess is returned even if the file does not exist". However, from what I see, it simply returns realpath(), and IMHO, it shouldn't try to guess something like that. So can we cut the description a bit?
Agree, this description confused me too.
Jiri
-- E-gards: Jimmy
Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:52:11 +0300 Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhekov@gmail.com wrote:
The description of tm_get_real_path() claims that "unlike realpath, a reasonable guess is returned even if the file does not exist". However, from what I see, it simply returns realpath(), and IMHO, it shouldn't try to guess something like that. So can we cut the description a bit?
Yes, sounds reasonable. I did change it on svn with r5054.
Thanks, Frank