On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:14:43 +1000, Lex wrote:
[..thinking about finally announcing the wiki...]
If nobody else has any blockers in mind, we could finally announce it to get more people look, use and extend it :).
The only question is whether it is better to announce it before or after the release or together?
By all means lets make it a *big* announcement.
While thinking about announcements, we have right now (well, very soon at least) three announcements ready to be go out:
- the wiki - the release - the changed project maintainer
I'm just not yet completely sure in what order to get them into the world.
Probably the wiki is a complete separat announcement, to be made on its own. Could be done easily and quickly.
The other two might be combined, that is, in the usual release announcement include the hoorays for Colomban as the new project maintainer.
What do you guys think?
Regards, Enrico
Le 01/10/2011 12:10, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:14:43 +1000, Lex wrote:
[..thinking about finally announcing the wiki...]
If nobody else has any blockers in mind, we could finally announce it to get more people look, use and extend it :).
The only question is whether it is better to announce it before or after the release or together?
By all means lets make it a *big* announcement.
While thinking about announcements, we have right now (well, very soon at least) three announcements ready to be go out:
- the wiki
- the release
- the changed project maintainer
I'm just not yet completely sure in what order to get them into the world.
Probably the wiki is a complete separat announcement, to be made on its own. Could be done easily and quickly.
Agreed.
The other two might be combined, that is, in the usual release announcement include the hoorays for Colomban as the new project maintainer.
I think it depends whether I'm supposed to become new maintainer for 0.21 (or whatever) or for 0.22. In the former case, I think both announcements should be done together (announcing new maintainer a couple of hours before a release done by this very maintainer looks a bit pointless). In the latter, I think it's fine to either announce together or after.
So basically I think that together makes sense.
Cheers, Colomban
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:39:19 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 01/10/2011 12:10, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:14:43 +1000, Lex wrote:
[..thinking about finally announcing the wiki...]
If nobody else has any blockers in mind, we could finally announce it to get more people look, use and extend it :).
The only question is whether it is better to announce it before or after the release or together?
By all means lets make it a *big* announcement.
While thinking about announcements, we have right now (well, very soon at least) three announcements ready to be go out:
- the wiki
- the release
- the changed project maintainer
I'm just not yet completely sure in what order to get them into the world.
Probably the wiki is a complete separat announcement, to be made on its own. Could be done easily and quickly.
Agreed.
The other two might be combined, that is, in the usual release announcement include the hoorays for Colomban as the new project maintainer.
I think it depends whether I'm supposed to become new maintainer for 0.21 (or whatever) or for 0.22. In the former case, I think both announcements should be done together (announcing new maintainer a couple of hours before a release done by this very maintainer looks a bit pointless). In the latter, I think it's fine to either announce together or after.
So basically I think that together makes sense.
just for the records, Colomban and me just talked on IRC about this as we were in the process of making the release and agreed on making the project maintainer change part of the release announcement. You'll see soon in your mailbox :D.
Regards, Enrico