On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of the geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just cause confusion, IMO.
So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by 0.20, and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
0.20. I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside is a good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this actually matches (geanylatex, geanyvc).
Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
I just fail to see how this could be an advantage. I only see the many disadvantages beginning at users' confusion and ending at duplicate maintenance efforts. And for plugins which are part of the combined geany-plugins project, these should all have the version of the g-p project itself as their are released together as one big package.
I'm fine for dong this with the plugins developed inside the combined project. I will not do it for geanyLaTeX as I want to keep freedom to do independent releases.
Cheers, Frank