On 2015-06-29 02:24 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 29 June 2015 at 18:24, Thomas Martitz kugel@rockbox.org wrote:
Am 29.06.2015 um 00:32 schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 29 June 2015 at 07:41, Colomban Wendling lists.ban@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 26/06/2015 07:22, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
[…]
However, as we entered string freeze, I don't suppose a new dialog like this is acceptable at this point?
It would be really better not to indeed?
What else can we do for *this* release?
Hum. If this is an important enough issue, I can see these solutions:
Default to not keep history (hence prompt);
Add an extra hidden setting "don't show this message again"-like for a
*future* dialog/infobar, so it still always asks unless the user manually changes this hidden setting.
Both are suboptimal for this feature, but if it's a problem we can probably delay default enabling to the next cycle.
Or just put a BIG notice in the release notes "Reload is now undoable so it doesn't prompt any more"
That helps only existing users, and only that fraction that actually reads release notes (I would think the bulk of them doesn't).
Well, yes, thats true, but it is something that can be done anyway, since it has no impact on code or strings or anything else :)
Perhaps it would be indeed best to not toggle the default for this release already?
PS: I do love this feature now that I'm aware of the undo'ability, it's not like I want to act against it. I just fear it creates user confusion for both new and existing users alike.
Certainly it gave you a fright, and its admirable that you try to save others from it, but personally I think you are too worried.
Not only it gave him fright, it lost him work because the change in behaviour is not common/obvious and lacks the visual queues needed to make one realize what has happened.
Cheers, Matthew Brush