Arthur,
Just a note that the protocal isn't a published supported interface, it is only use is geany-geany. So the only poorly written client is Geany itself :) If thats the case definitely report it.
Cheers Lex
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Matthew Brush mbrush@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 01/01/2012 11:47 AM, Arthur Skowronek wrote:
- the protocol itself is prone to a dry lock in the "doclist" command - poorly written client code can dead lock geany for a few seconds
Can you file bug reports for these? (assuming they aren't just "theoretical" problems but actual bugs)
Cheers, Matthew Brush
Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel