On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of the geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just cause confusion, IMO.
So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by 0.20, and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
0.20. I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside is a good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this actually matches (geanylatex, geanyvc).
Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
Sorry for the wrong information. I just had a look at the geany-plugins repository and there is still the geanyvc directory. Maybe this could be removed?
I just fail to see how this could be an advantage. I only see the many disadvantages beginning at users' confusion and ending at duplicate maintenance efforts. And for plugins which are part of the combined geany-plugins project, these should all have the version of the g-p project itself as their are released together as one big package.
I'm fine for dong this with the plugins developed inside the combined project. I will not do it for geanyLaTeX as I want to keep freedom to do independent releases.
Nobody will hinder you from doing that. I just said I don't see any advantage of this but my opinion regarding this is not new and I expressed it a couple of times already in the past. Since it's your plugin, it's your decision.
Regards, Enrico