Am Freitag, den 07.01.2011, 17:24 +0100 schrieb Frank Lanitz:
Am 07.01.2011 17:02, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Le 07/01/2011 16:41, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
Am 07.01.2011 15:17, schrieb Alexander Petukhov:
Hello, everybody.
My name is Alexander, i'm a software developer from St.Petersburg, Russia. I started to use Geany at my job, mostly for C++ development, and only feature I was not satisfied with was debuggers support. I looked at the existing GDB plugin but it's seemed a little bit unusual for me, and next I thought about multiple debuggers support in one plugin. So I started to develop my own plugin with the foregoing in mind:
- more VS, Netbeans,... likely GUI
- multiple debuggers support
Now i have GDB working more or less enough for using, and feel like I need some feedback. (I started to work on bashbd backend, but faced some problems and decided to postpone it, until GDB and general features will work well).
So, project adress at SF is https://sourceforge.net/projects/geanydbg/ Also I've prepared a little page with a description - http://geanydbg.sourceforge.net/walkthrough.htm
Waiting four your opinions and feedbacks.
Just a general: Maybe we should think about renaming as the 'original' one already is called geanydbg[1]
AFAIK (and as far as I can see) the original is geanygdb and Alexander's one is geanydbg. OK, it's a bit confusing, but it's at least not the same ^^ But I agree, changing the name to something more different would be better I think.
Oh.... You are right. I'm sorry. But obviously its a good sign for changing :D
geanygdb geanydbg externdbg
...
and I think I remember another plugin which earlier was called geanydbg. Could be that's what externdbg now is and it got renamed right to avoid such confusion for the users... I also vote to rename the plugin.
Regards, Dominic