On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:49:52 +0100 Colomban Wendling lists.ban@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Looks fine to me, could you provide a git-formatted patch (so there are authorship information in it) please?
Sure.
Actually -Wmissing-field-initializers warns about fields implicitly initialized to 0, which is not a real problem but that "often" is unwanted.
I guess it's safe to expect that our CC will implement the 1990 standard on this. :)