Le 05/11/2011 01:28, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 11-11-04 04:03 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 04/11/2011 23:28, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 03:18, Matthew Brushmbrush@codebrainz.ca wrote:
[...]
All on one line:
git filter-branch --msg-filter "sed -e 's|svnroot/geany-plugins/trunk/geany-plugins@|viewvc/geany-plugins?view=revision&revision=|'"
HEAD
Works fine at least looking at quite a few of the commits in gitk and has the advantage of linking to the better ViewVC code browser that SourceForge offers.
OK, thanks. So is there any "official" conclusion which format should be used? (I don't have any strong preference here.)
I'd personally prefer to have a valid SVN URL rather than a valid HTTP link, but again, I don't mind much.
Thanks for pointing out now *after* so much time and discussion that the existing URL *was a valid SVN URL*. I'm glad I wasted my time :)
</sarcasm>
@Jiri I'd say it's your call, in light of this new information, I'd say leave it as is and get it done as soon as you have time (assuming no one else objects).
Sorry, I though you already knew it :/
However, Enrico agreed with setting up something appropriate on geany.org, so if you think it's worth it, maybe it'd be possible to have svn.geany.org/svnroot/geany-plugins@rev as a URL both valid for SVN and a viewvc. I totally agree that having the URL somewhere we control is better, I'm just not completely sure it's worth the effort (but maybe it's actually cheap, dunno).
Regards, Colomban