On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:21:49 +0200 Jiří Techet techet@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 17:42, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:22:05 +0200 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
> I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and > GIT. We use SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal > projects. I like GIT better than SVN. > > In my humble opinion you shouldn't switch unless you are > unhappy with sourceforge / svn.
I agree. For our current development process I don't see any big need to change away from SVN. It will cost a lot of effort with no extra profit adding.
I'd like to second that. And, while I use local Git repository for Geany, I'm completely happy with git-svn (and my separate SVN branch, of course :).
I agree. Same here.
Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can indeed save us the whole trouble of discussing about switching :).
To be honest, it would be some hassle for me to switch. I only have experience using Git locally, no push/pull/branches. But that experience was great, I like the tool.
So I think as Lex has suggested, that we shouldn't switch right now. Maybe some time in the future. I don't have time ATM to learn Git/investigate switching.
Also as regards sourceforge, I agree with Enrico that we want to stay with them for now at least.
Just for those interested, I have created a complete import of your SVN repo to git. The result is here:
Nice.
- You have to create the authors file with names and email addresses
of the committers. Each line has the form:
committer = full name email@address.com
This was easy because most of them are already present in your git mirror. The missing ones were:
kretek
Is an old nick of mine.
Cheers, Frank