Hi Jiri,
On 5 October 2011 08:37, Jiří Techet techet@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are still a few points unresolved:
I have a few comments (and questions) myself:
- Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because
they have the same name as tags and they are ambiguous when doing "git checkout". Some naming scheme for stable branches should be invented.
I was proposing to have two digit branches and three digit tags:
Geany-0_19 - maintenance branch Geany-0_19_0 - tag Geany-0_19_1 - tag Geany-0_19_2 - tag
Do you agree or do you prefer some different naming scheme?
I agree.
[...]
- I kept the bs2 and sm branches in the repository but once the
migration is done, they should be cloned by their owners and should be removed from the main repository.
I can create official Geany repository without them and one clone that contains them so their authors can pick them after the conversion.
As bs2 owner I am happy for it to go away, its too out of date. I would start again anyway.
I don't own sm, but I hope it will get merged by next version so we need a clone for that.
Cheers Lex