On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:47:22 +0100% Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:06:26 +1100 Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 January 2011 02:54, Frank Lanitz frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:31:21 +0300 Eugene Arshinov earshinov@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
It is harder to find the discussion than the patches themselves, but here is a couple of links:
http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2009-November/001577.html (X session management support) http://lists.uvena.de/geany-devel/2010-January/001655.html (Questions about Geany project support)
I don't object against your patches, but I'm just pointing to existing discussion which may be useful. I must note that there are no plans about including those patches from 'sm' branch in trunk (because nobody would want/have time to do it, and it won't be quite easy as 'sm' branch has become rather diverse from trunk), so your way is free :)
Well, not sure whether I'm right the branch wasn't ready for including to trunk and nobody did care about later on. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I guess now (post 0.20) is the time to do major additions, if a current trunk is merged with sm branch and it still works then maybe its time.
I guess this is something the original author of the branch needs to do.
Cheers, Frank
Certainly. I've already merged trunk in my local Git repository, but I haven't yet find some time to carefully test the branch again. Though, I use this merged version at home every day and experience no problems, so most things should be fine. Tomorrow I'll update the SVN sm branch.
Best regards, Eugene.