On 4 May 2017 at 01:09, Joshua A. Einstein-Curtis jeinstei@fnal.gov wrote:
Thank you!
It looks like Geany's Verilog parser is out of date. compared with those. How often does Geany push in updated ctags parsers?
Basically when someone makes a pull request to do so. One trap to look out for is that the original ctags became abandoned for many years, and during that period some of the parsers in Geany continued to evolve. I don't know if Verilog was in that set. Not all of the Geany changes have been absorbed back into the universal ctags fork.
Cheers Lex
Josh E-C
From: Devel devel-bounces@lists.geany.org on behalf of Lex Trotman elextr@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:03:48 AM To: Geany development list Subject: Re: [Geany-Devel] Adding SystemVerilog Parser
Hi,
If you mean the parsers in the ctags/parsers directory, those come from the Universal Ctags project https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags so you should probably start by asking there.
Cheers Lex
On 3 May 2017 at 23:23, Joshua A. Einstein-Curtis jeinstei@fnal.gov wrote:
Hi Geany developers,
I'm locally am updating the Verilog parser/creating a SystemVerilog parser with updated keywords and kinds. I don't know if anyone has already started this, but if so, I'd be interested in working off of a base.
Do we have a standard for changing file headers while still attributing original file creation correctly?
Josh Einstein-Curtis
Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel