On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:36:53 +0100% Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:17:02 +0300, Eugene wrote:
<...>
Before you commit, I'd like to know how the changes would go to "sm" branch. It is not so important for me (as I use a local Git repository anyway), but it could be important for the one who will commit my patches (e.g., probably Nick). Will it be done using SVN merge, or will there be separate commits (same patches applied to different branches)?
I just added you to the project at Sourceforge, so you have SVN write access.
Just commit this patch and your other pending patches into the SM branch. This way the patches don't get lost and will make review/testing easier. When you are done and things seem to work, we can merge the branch into trunk.
Okay. I'll have time to finish it during the next week.
Just be sure to follow our coding styles where possible (see HACKING), this would reduce additional work when merging the changes but I guess this is pretty obvious :).
Okay.
Best regards, Eugene.