Le 22/01/2011 11:54, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100 > Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote: > >> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the >> combined geany-plugins releases should have the version of the >> geany-plugins release itself. Everything else would just cause >> confusion, IMO. > > So we are going to have my_plugin version 0.5, followed by 0.20, > and then 0.6 or 0.7? Which one is the latest?
0.20. I was never convinced maintaining plugins within g-p and outside is a good idea. AFAIK there are only a few plugins for which this actually matches (geanylatex, geanyvc).
Only geanylatex is left here. geanyVC is part since about 0.18.1
Sorry for the wrong information. I just had a look at the geany-plugins repository and there is still the geanyvc directory. Maybe this could be removed?
It is. Just check http://git.geany.org/geany-plugins/tree/
Then it seems the GIT mirror is broken. See http://geany-plugins.svn.sf.net/viewvc/geany-plugins/trunk, and for some reason, I think the SVN repo is more important than the GIT mirror :).
Seems that git-svn doesn't remove .svn directories, so the dirs containing them doesn't get removed...