On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:37:08 +0100 Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
@Nick, you replied previously that you didn't expect to implement a fully extendible filetype system (except as a dream :-) but how far are you planning to go? For example using an existing lexer/tag parser so no programming is needed, could it make enough of a separate filetype to do the things I've listed above?
I think using an existing lexer (even with separate custom-FT styles) and using an existing tag parser seems fairly straightforward to implement, I might look at it soon.
Implemented (without separate custom-FT lexer styles). I added "lexer_filetype" and "tag_parser" [settings] keys, explained (briefly) in the 'Filetype definition files' section of the manual.
Regards, Nick