Le 13/06/2011 19:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
[...]
Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving?
Yeah, I'd say let's go!
I second this.
Okay, let's do then :) However, I just realized that GTK 2.12 [1] depends on GLib 2.14, not 2.16 [2] as you suggested so... do we depend on GLib 2.14 (as GTK 2.12) or 2.16 (to get GIO in)?
I wanted GLib 2.16 because of GIO to get rid of #ifdefs. And based on Debian Lenny's GTK/Glib versions, I suggested the combination of GTK 2.12 and GLib 2.16 although they were not released in the same cycle.
Fine for me, just wanted to check what you meant exactly. An I agree that having GIO in is one of the important thing to get rid of many #ifedfs.
Btw, Nick is using GTK 2.12, so unless there is a super cool fancy feature in GTK 2.14 we cannot miss, I'd say 2.12 is ok for now.
No, I don't know of anything special that would make depending on 2.14 so much better. 2.12's fine.
I'll then do the bump soon.
Cheers, Colomban