On 4 August 2012 11:14, Matthew Brush mbrush@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 12-08-03 05:58 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
I thought the Git branch was Eugenes and he already said it could be removed??
See below.
If my memory is right, then removing it and applying the patch to a "new_sm" branch would be the way to go.
I pushed the libsm patch from the patch tracker to a new Git branch[1] a couple weeks ago or so, expecting to be getting emails from sf.net when the patch tracker was updated to queue me to apply the latest patch to the Git branch.
IMO, it makes more sense to maintain it as a branch (or merging into the master branch) in the Git repository, even thought the patch tracker item is meticulously well documented/commented/updated. If Dimitar doesn't mind working on the Git repo instead of keeping a sf.net patch tracker item up to date, I'd be +1 for that.
Ah, missed that one :)
So totally agree, Dimitar should be given rights to maintain this instead of the patch if he wants to.
Cheers Lex
Cheers, Matthew Brush
[1] https://github.com/geany/geany/commit/0f07b31aa866f92dcbaf29659ead7beab60a1d...
Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel