On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:03:37 +0100, Nick Treleaven nick.treleaven@btinternet.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:01:57 +0200 Enrico Tröger enrico.troeger@uvena.de wrote:
Honestly, I don't care much. Yes, it would be nicer if they were all named using a unique scheme. But this causes renaming, changing files where the file names are used, may result in odd left-overs or other potential problems which aren't really necessary (ok, probably it's not that much work, but it is also not really a big problem at all). If you feel really uncomfortable with that, feel free to change it. If not, I don't care.
OK, I'll leave it. Do you have any preference for any new files I might add in future: newfile.h new-file.h new_file.h? I guess the rule could be to use the first one unless the name is confusing, like uiutils would be - in those cases, use underscores. Probably I'll
This what I thought. As long as it stays readable, no separation characters, and otherwise, use an underscore. That's what I'd prefer.
rename the plugin-symbols.c file as this seems to be the exception, as tm_source_file.h uses underscores.
yeah.
Regards, Enrico