On 17/08/2013 10:01, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 13-08-17 01:22 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 17/08/2013 06:20, Matthew Brush a écrit :
[...]
P.S. Just a nitpick, the current ANSI C standard is C11, not C99 or C89/90 (Of course, I'm just being sarcastically pedantic for fun and know exactly what you meant[1] :)
…and you failed at it, because the only ANSI C there is is ANSI X3.159-1989 (C89), all other ones are ISO standards ;)
I just go from Wiki as usual: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_C#C11
(Sounds like ANSI adopts all ISO standards for this)
OK, I'll use C90 instead of ANSI C in future then ;-)