On 2016-08-31 10:47 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 2016-08-31 10:08 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 31.08.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Lex Trotman:
I think we all agree that help of language-specific plugins is desired/required. No need to restate "we need language specific support" all the time.
We just disagree on how the language-specific knowledge is transported to Geany, other plugins and the user.
Well, I read your previous comments such as "But *just* the data, don't offload very specific use cases onto them" (and to some extent this one too) as saying that all the plugin has to do is return some data (tags) and Geany will take it from there and all I was doing was making sure it was clear that its unlikely that Geany will be able to "take it from there" in any meaningful way, based purely on data, without filetype specific knowledge inside Geany.
Here we disagree. I think it is possible to extent TM/Geany sufficiently to encode this information in generic ways. As an example, template instantiation yields different types. TM could tread them as different types. Any variable will be of one of the types, so calltips would just work.
Let's use the simplest C example:
gint x = g_...Please describe the algorithm (just in prose) that would give only the valid completions (ie. would compile in a C compiler) for `g_...` without providing any impossible completions, and without knowing anything about C/C++/Obj-C.
To make it more interesting, you can assume that the full C/C++/Obj-C AST is somehow represented with full fidelity in a TM tags array, as a given.
Cheers, Matthew Brush