[Geany-Users] Fedora 25 Repo is Missing geany-plugins

[Dominic Hopf]

Greetings,

just to clarify the situation, I actually am the Fedora packager of Geany
and Geany-Plugins. Even if there probably is a syntax issue in the RPM
Specfile - which is stated by rpmlint you see some more information about
this update, beneath some others, the fact that it is available in the
stable Fedora repositories. There is no single Fedora package of
Geany-Plugins. It is intended (and usual on Fedora) to install stuff this
way:

    sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*'


Regards,
Dominic




On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Fedge No <fedge-no at hotmail.com> wrote:

> If you have a look at that link it apparently shows that both geany and
> geany-plugins failed rpmlint, whatever that is. That's probably why the
> plugins aren't available as a single package. I am not sure why geany
> itself is. Maybe an older version was provided before the new one
> failed that lint test.
>
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:01 +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > as far as I can see the current Geany-Plugins 1.29 should be
> > available in the stable Fedora 25 repositories:
> >
> >     https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01ad22d5c5
> >
> > Please note that, with dnf, the usage for the installation changed a
> > bit and you will have to put quotes around the package pattern:
> >
> >     sudo dnf install 'geany-plugins-*'
> >
> > However, you are right that the installation instructions on the
> > website were not up-to-date. This now has been fixed with http://tiny
> > .cc/q4qphy
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dominic
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Fedge No <fedge-no at hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > The Fedora plugins documentation page is a little outdated. The
> > > page
> > > shows to use yum, not dnf and the repo doesn't have a package with
> > > the
> > > name geany-plugins. I suppose the yum command is still mapped to
> > > dnf and
> > > that would be better for CentOS users or something. I was hoping to
> > > install them all with one shot but it looks like I will have to do
> > > them
> > > individually for now. There seems to be two versions of
> > > geany-plugins-lipsum that conflict as well so dnf install
> > > geany-plugins-* doesn't work, either. I don't know if this is all
> > > intentional but I found it a bit inconvenient. Most people using
> > > Geany
> > > probably know how to work around this sort of stuff but it is what
> > > it is.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users at lists.geany.org
> > > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface
> > aus geschrieben habe.
> >
> > This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web
> > interface.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.geany.org
> > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.geany.org
> https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>



-- 
Diese E-Mail ist nicht mit GPG signiert, da ich sie vom Webinterface aus
geschrieben habe.

This mail is not signed with GPG because I wrote it from web interface.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161214/eda9a984/attachment.html>