[Geany] Compiler output interpretation - Hack patch included

[Jon Senior]

>-----Original Message-----
>Perhaps, but then the general/gcc-style parsing would have to be 
>duplicated into the Java case. I don't use Java myself, but I imagine 
>that when compiling with gcj the error message style is the same as 
>gcc.

It shouldn't do. The if statement checks to see if it's Java AND if we have ant style output. Since the "break" is inside the if, if it's not Java AND ant (ie. just Java) it'll carry on through until it reaches the default case.

Not that it really matters from a functionality point of view, but since you've created a java case, you might as well use it. :-)

The output from javac is syntactically the same as that of gcc. I've never used gcj but I would assume it's the same.

Jon