Hi.
When renaming a file opened in geany with `disk_check_timeout!=0` a prompt is correctly displayed. Renaming it back again, and reloading it (File->Reload) everything *seems* fine. However, if the project is then closed and reopened, that file is gone.
I did not totally verify this, but my educated guess is:
In document.c:monitor_resave_missing_file the `real_path` of the missing is set to null `SETPTR(doc->real_path, NULL);`
Reloading the file does not change this.
In keyfile.c:configuration_save_session_files
`if (doc != NULL && doc->real_path != NULL)`
`real_path` is still null (unless manually saved before), so the file is gone.
Suggested fix (seems to be working):
~~~
document.c:document_open_file_full
if (! reload)
{
doc = document_create(utf8_filename);
g_return_val_if_fail(doc != NULL, NULL); /* really should not happen */
/* file exists on disk, set real_path */
SETPTR(doc->real_path, utils_get_real_path(locale_filename));
doc->priv->is_remote = utils_is_remote_path(locale_filename);
monitor_file_setup(doc);
}
+ else {
+ if( doc != NULL ){
+ SETPTR(doc->real_path, utils_get_real_path(locale_filename));
+ }
+ }
~~~
Thanks.
Tycho
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3202
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <geany/geany/issues/3202(a)github.com>
This is rebased #3175 with cleaned up commit history but no functional change.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3185
-- Commit Summary --
* Rename tm_tag_file_t to tm_tag_local_var_t
* Enable local tag generation for C/C++
* Update goto symbol definitions to take into account local variables
* Update (non-scope) autocompletion to take into account local variables
* Update scope completion to take into account local variables
* Strip more things from variable type
* Support (multiple) inheritance by scope completion
* Sort tags so tags from source file's header are preferred to other files
* Rewrite member_at_method_scope() to handle more situations
* Sort non-scope autocompletion results by locality
* Make validity of local variables configurable based on used language
-- File Changes --
M src/editor.c (15)
M src/symbols.c (13)
M src/tagmanager/tm_parser.c (26)
M src/tagmanager/tm_parser.h (4)
M src/tagmanager/tm_workspace.c (546)
M src/tagmanager/tm_workspace.h (6)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3185.patchhttps://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3185.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3185
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3185(a)github.com>
This problem can be seen on
scintilla/src/Document.cxx
where not all anonymous tags are renamed because of macros. Fix that
by not breaking the rename loop for macros for C-like languages.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3195
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix anonymous tag renaming when interleaved by scopeless macros
-- File Changes --
M src/tagmanager/tm_ctags.c (11)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3195.patchhttps://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3195.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3195
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3195(a)github.com>
I have a some questions about a few things:
1. I could not figure out what the following properties are for:
marker_line
marker_search
marker_mark
call_tips
white_space
string_eol
scalar
label
decorator
extra
entity
2. The "version" property says "incremented automatically, do not change manually" should I just leave it at 1225?
3. How do I make the "#include" part of a preprocessor command a different color than "<stdio.h>"
4. what is the difference between:
number, number_1, and number_2
keyword, keyword_1, keyword_2, keyword_3, and keyword_4
identifier, identifier_1, identifier_2, identifier_3, and identifier_4
string, string_1, string_2, string_3, and string_4
5. How do I get rid of the vertical line through the middle of the editor (shown in [this picture](https://i.imgur.com/oPNI8G8.png))?
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/geany/geany-themes/pull/21
-- Commit Summary --
* added atom-one-dark theme
-- File Changes --
M AUTHORS (5)
A colorschemes/atom-one-dark.conf (116)
A screenshots/atom-one-dark.png (0)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/geany/geany-themes/pull/21.patchhttps://github.com/geany/geany-themes/pull/21.diff
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-themes/pull/21
I am editing C programs with about 2,000 LOC. There seems to be an intermittent past corruption error. It may happen on "Find and Replace" or "Copy" (Ctrl-C) and then "Paste" (Ctrl-V) elsewhere.
The corrupting text seems to be randomly sprayed in a few places. I find out it happened when I attempt to recompile my code and gcc complains. The corrupting text can land in comments, blank lines, in varaible names, you name it.
So now, if I am pasting anything, I save the file, end Geany, and bring it back up.
I am running on a Raspberry Pi 3B+, Raspbian OS. The only package I believe I downloaded is gcc. The Geany version is "Gorgon", (built on or after 2018-04-16). I am not aware of having any Geany plugins.
The editor is great and works 95% of the time. I just keep hitting the corruption errors if I stay in it too long.
Any help is appreciated.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2753
I love Geany and use it all the time, but I was a little disappointed to find that CSS extension languages - such as Sass, SCSS and Less - do not have syntax highlighting
The userbase for these is probably small enough that new syntax highlighting rules specific to these languages would not be worthwhile, but to me it would make sense for the '.less' and '.scss' filename extensions to be recognised as CSS files (the same as '.css'); these languages are supersets of vanilla CSS (so the new features they add would still not receive highlighting, but most of the usual syntax highlighting one might expect would work)
Sass syntax is slightly different (uses indentation rather than braces a-la-Python) but still not a million miles from normal CSS.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2767
geany 1.37.1 (built on 2021-01-05 with GTK 3.24.24, GLib 2.66.4) on Manjaro Linux
I am unable to use execute(F5), I get the message:
`06:38:20: Cannot execute build command "xterm -e "/bin/sh /tmp/geany_run_script_Z4MN20.sh"": No such file or directory. Check the Terminal setting in Preferences`
the terminal is not set to xterm, in the preferences I have:
`/usr/bin/gnome-terminal -e /bin/zsh %c`
I've tried other terminals as well.
The Compile and Build options do work
also xterm does not seem to be installed by default on Manjaro, and is not installed on my system.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2803
It might be cool to make [the GP website](https://plugins.geany.org) into a section/page on the new site or at least use the same backend/css framework/etc. Maybe `plugins.geany.org` could just re-direct to a new `/plugins` route/page on the new site?
I'm not sure whether that's a lot of work or not.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/issues/14
I love the ability to theme the edit area and I prefer a darker theme.
The problem is that the theme does not apply to the side bar which to my mind is a bit inconsistent. Especially when there is a strong light / dark contrast.
I am sure there are users that would prefer it to stay the way it is but for myself at least I would optionally like the relevant portions of the theme to apply to the side bar.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1344
)?](http://picture](https://i.imgur.com/oPNI8G8.png))?){kind=link}